Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kanyfug/Archive
Kanyfug
Kanyfug (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
24 August 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
I was editing the article Wild Side (Normani song), removing a poorly sourced "critical acclaim" claim in the critical reception and adding facts about how the song dropped -31 spots in the next week on the Billboard Hot 100. Kanyfug reverts my edit, saying that thatgrapejuice.net is a reliable source (it's not) and personally attacking me WP:NPA by calling me a troll. I point out that again, thatgrapejuice.net is not a reliable source, and re-add the properly sourced information about the song dropping on Billboard.
A few hours after I revert my properly sourced edit, IP number one (2601:4a:c184:bf0:fcc7:8583:2401:b1db) reverts the same edit with no edit summary whatsoever. A couple things of note: This IP's first and only contribution so far is to the Wild Side article, and also uses mobile web edit & visual edit, with almost the exact same editing tags as Kanyfug. I revert it, obviously picking up that it's a sockpuppet, and IP number two (2601:4A:C184:BF0:ECA6:27DB:F55E:C499) comes, with the exact same first and only edit being Wild Side and also using mobile web edit & visual edit. Note: (2603:7000:9B3F:BE89:BC29:3D5B:1473:98E1) and (2601:42:900:BEF0:4453:7325:6BDD:8E9D) may also be additional IP sock puppets, yet I am not as sure of it. Anwyays, here are the diffs:
Diffs: [1] [2] [3] [4] "Pop pills now we Shanghai!"(talk to me!~) 10:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- Gave them a {{uw-login}}. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)