User talk:140.0.143.230

September 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 14:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Useless, badly sourced, and unsuitable additions

I've had to remove or heavily alter about 95% of what you added to various "Largest" lists so far, and I'm growing tired of it. If you cannot make sure that you a) always provide sources, b) don't add contradictory or plain wrong information, c) don't add material that has no business being on the lists (second-largest, or something "just large" that apparently happened to catch your attention), and d) put a minimum of care into not slapping half-sentences and ungrammatical fragments into lists - I'm going to straight up undo your additions, without taking half an hour to sift through the rubbish for the odd usable bit. Please do this properly or not at all. --Elmidae (talk · contribs)

---