Jump to content

User talk:Scott9432

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:37, 2 October 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The article ScottAviation has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ScottAviation

[edit]

A tag has been placed on ScottAviation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Skomorokh 14:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of ScottAviation

[edit]

A tag has been placed on ScottAviation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Apparition11 (talk) 20:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Travel City Direct

[edit]

Thanks for your message about Travel City Direct, the reason why the information on aircraft was removed as Travel City Direct is not actually an airline just a travel operator. I have no problem if you want to add information about other companies aircraft being painted in Travel City Direct colour scheme but information on the history and registrations of individual aircraft is not notable and not included. Refer to WP:AIRLINES for information. If you have a problem with not including this sort of information then can I suggest you bring it up at either Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines or on the article talk page . The main problem is that it is not an airline. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XL Airways - You can add information to the XL Airways but the registrations and histories of individual aircraft will probably be challenged. Another way would be to propose what you want to add on the XL Airways talk page and get a feeling of other editors. Probably the only relevant info would be if the XL Airways were repainted in Travel City colours, which I dont think has happened. The acquisition of the three Air Atlanta Europe 747s is already mentioned. MilborneOne (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your close for two reasons: the formatting was incorrect, and as nominator you shouldn't be closing anyway (nobody who has expressed an opinion at AfD should close that debate). I've closed the AfD as keep because you withdrew the nomination. To see how to perform a non-admin closure and the rules around doing so, see Wikipedia:Non-admin closure. Fences&Windows 19:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]