Jump to content

User talk:BalancedIssues

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 5 October 2021 (top: Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 11:26, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Partisan editors might use "standard messages" without explanation to intimidate or silence editors, even like mafia people throwing something at your doorstep.
As it is known that stranded people sometimes expose a compensating digital behavior I myself would always refrain from sending unclear messages.
Now to you, Acroterion, unless you have a specific complaint about my edits that you can explain it might be better if you refrained from indirect activities. From you behavior I can only infer you didn't like my exposing of double standards in the talk page of the Jeffrey Epstein article.
As you seem to prefer communicating with "standard messages" and focussing on persons instead of focussing on content, I just wonder: Do you also place those "standard messages" to editors like "Bus stop" (with their ever changing private theories and reasonings in the Jeffrey Epstein talk page, and even with edit-warring like behavior in the article space that you are "protecting"?)--BalancedIssues (talk) 10:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bus stop is aware of the editing restrictions, You, as an apparently new editor with a remarkable single focus on the Jewishness of an accused criminal, had not yet been notified. Now you are. Acroterion (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]