Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup systems and recovery
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:43, 10 October 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:43, 10 October 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 14:14, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
Not an encyclopedia article, possibly copied from somewhere. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 19:18, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agreed --Xcali 19:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Google doesn't seem to indicate that it's copyvio, but it reads almost like a preface to a job listing. At any rate, certainly delete this; it is not encyclopedic. --Idont Havaname 20:25, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Information Technology Audit - Regulation. This is part of a larger project by a group of (graduate?) students. I'm not sure about the feasiblity of such a project, but rather than delete this, some of which might be valuable information on an encyclopedic topic, it should be cleaned up and probably all merged into a main article. Since it's a class project, the authors should all be dedicated contributors to the articles. Let's see what they can do with it and then judge the final product. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 21:25, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
- To the authors of these pages: have you registered usernames? You can do so here. I would also suggest reading Help:Starting a new page and Wikipedia:Manual of style, for starters. Please feel free to leave questions on my talk page or send me email – I will respond as quickly as I can. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 21:25, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry about that; I'll try to talk to them about the formatting of their page when next I see them. Sorry for the inconvenience ~ M
- Keep We are the group in charge of this article, and we have cleaned it up a bit, hopefully to wikipedia's standards. Thanks -Group6 25:35, 5 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is coming along nicely. - DS1953 00:07, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- keep Yo, I'm just a user, but I sought out this page today, looking for general ideas on data backup philosophies and schedules. The article wasn't exactly what I wanted, so it could be improved, but better than nothing.
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
- Comment. Thanks a lot guys. My other hard drive isn't booting, and I wish I knew of some good recovery programs.--67.190.25.121 07:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]