Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axia Investments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Axia Investments

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Axia Investments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This en.wiki article was created as a new account's 11th edit, moved to draft, rejected and then accepted at AfC. A Wikidata item containing promotional content ("AXIA Investments is a registered brand of the most secure and trusted trading online broker in the MENA region. Start Trading with AXIA Investments." [1]) was created around the same time and there also appears to have been a subsequently deleted ar.wiki article. Regarding this en.wiki article, the references do not appear to rise above listings describing the company's product proposition (though strangely one, the ArabInvest posting, prefaces the product listing with strongly negative paragraphs about the firm). Setting out a company's wares is insufficient to demonstrate attained WP:NCORP notability. AllyD (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

• delete Clearly a promo piece for the company, perhaps by their PR department. And does not pass WP:N given the mixed up nature of the sources they tried to pile up there. Let them do promo elsewhere. Ode+Joy (talk) 21:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

• comment ok, it looks like an an advertisement, clealy not part of the rulz Esaïe Prickett (talk) 03:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete - as far as I can see, there only appear to be press releases available or content that simply regurgitates such press releases, so does not pass WP:NCORP, in particular WP:ORGIND Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Promotional. scope_creep^Talk 23:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.