User talk:Cindery

; Archives
	July 2006 – September 2006; ; ;

Welcome!

Hello, Cindery, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 21:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mumblio Speaks!

I've kept up with the abortion page, Cindery. If things were this rough on the boxing page, there would be blood in the streets! I may be young in the ways of Wiki - before two days ago, the only sock puppets I'd heard of were in WHAT ABOUT BOB - but I am sadly experienced in the ways of the world ('for he who increaseth knowledge, increaseth sorrow.'). However, it looks like things are moving in a good direction. I think I'll go back to the page and do some proofing and a bit of copy-editing post-consensus.

RFCU

I have opened another checkuser on you here. --Spartaz 10:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your current block

Please read this thread on ANI and respond here. MartinDK 12:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Every word Nick says is a lie, including "and" and "the." He's just vindictive because I filed an RfC against him last month: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sir_Nicholas_de_Mimsy-Porpington

I have never followed any of Samir's edits or edited any article Samir edits, but I did recently discover what looks like his little sockpuppet army at this page [1] [2] [3] [4] (because I follow Blnguyen's admin log somewhat ever since he protected Barrington Hall without a request for page protection):http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:National_Research_Council_of_Canada

sockpuppets:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roytoubassi

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jack_Stanley

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:J.Stanley

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Barry_Zuckerkorn

-Cindery 14:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that this IP was also a sockpuppet, on the same page, unless it was a login failure: 205.211.160.1 (5 sockpuppets in one short discussion...)-Cindery 14:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And here's an interesting little interaction: User:Roytoubassi changes another editor's comments:[5], and a real editor explains to him that he can't do that/must revert:[6]. The reversion is made...and then Samir undoes it sometime later:[7].-Cindery 14:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have some kind of official reply you would like to be placed in the ANI thread? I can copy it over for you. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 15:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mmhmm--include everything above, and this thread from a mere two weeks ago, in which you opine about your non-neutrality, and Nick's: [8]-Cindery 15:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you want incivility as part of your official response? ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 16:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it's embarassing for you to juxtapose your outrageous personal attack with evidence of your self-admitted bias following the You Tube/External Link dispute, especially because it contains a link to the Foundation statement that you were "lazy and paranoid," and that editors needed to "actively resist."-Cindery 16:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]