Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Michael of Yugoslavia

Prince Michael of Yugoslavia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Prince Michael of Yugoslavia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, looks like deposed monarchy cruft. PatGallacher (talk) 14:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as fails WP:NBIO and definitely fails WP:NPOL. Important to remember WP:NOTINHERETED. Current sources in the article are passing references or primary sources (the NYT piece actually kind of pokes fun at the Prince for being an inconsequential society figure: "How come he spells his name in French?") and don't give WP:SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE does not uncover any sources but this source does says "as far as I have been able to ascertain, Prince Michael of Yugoslavia does not exist." I think that sums it up. Vladimir.copic (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eternal Shadow Talk 19:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to Karađorđević dynasty. Kathlene Smoot (talk) 19:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
• Keep I find some coverages to say that he meets WP:GNG. He involved in a notable scandal which provides him media attention [1] [2] and [3] [4]. [5] is a in-depth coverage about him. VocalIndia (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)