Jump to content

Wikipedia

Edit links
Page extended-protected
Listen to this article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mts0405 (talk | contribs) at 19:48, 3 February 2007 (→Characteristics). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Favicon of Wikipedia Wikipedia
Wikipedia's multilingual portal shows the project's different language editions.
Screenshot of Wikipedia's multilingual portal
Type of site
Internet encyclopedia project
Available in182 active editions
HeadquartersMiami, Florida
OwnerWikimedia Foundation
Created byJimmy Wales, Larry Sanger
URLhttp://www.wikipedia.org/
CommercialNo
RegistrationOptional

Wikipedia (IPA: /ˌwiːkiːˈpiːdi.ə/) is a multilingual, Web-based, free content encyclopedia project. Wikipedia is written collaboratively by volunteers; with rare exceptions, its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Web site. The name is a portmanteau of the words wiki (a type of collaborative website) and encyclopedia. Its primary servers are in Tampa, Florida, with additional servers in Amsterdam and Seoul.

Wikipedia was launched as an English language project on January 15 2001, as a complement to Nupedia, an expert-written and now defunct encyclopedia. The project is now operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization created by Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales, and has over six million articles in 250 languages,[1] including 1.6 million in the English-language edition. Wikipedia has steadily risen in popularity since its inception[2] and currently ranks among the twelve most-visited websites worldwide.[3]

Wikipedia's popularity and novelty has attracted considerable attention from academics as well as the press.






Wikipedia sucks. Noone likes it is a load of crap. Whoever made it has no brain. I hope i get blocked because its cool.




Characteristics

Image depicting the linking characteristics of a wiki; pages are linked extensively, which allows the user to traverse a pathway of related articles.

Wikipedia uses wiki software to allow multiple authors to edit the encyclopedia simultaneously and to archive their changes in a database. Relevant articles may be found by following hyperlinks from one article to another, in the same way as cross-references in traditional works. Wikipedia also has its own topical organization; articles are grouped into a searchable category system[4] analogous to the Outline of Knowledge found in the Propædia of the Encyclopædia Britannica, except that it is not strictly hierarchical. Wikipedia also has portals intended to provide readers with an overview of a topic.[5]

Editorial process

Editors are encouraged to create a user account, which allows them to create new articles. However, authors may also edit anonymously; in such cases, their IP address is recorded as the author name.[6] Past edits to Wikipedia articles are retained, and remain viewable through "edit history" pages sorted chronologically, making it possible to see former versions of any page at any time.

Editors keep track of changes to articles by checking the difference between two revisions of a page, displayed here in red.

Changes to Wikipedia are made available immediately on the Web, without formal peer review. Wikipedia's philosophy is that free-wheeling collaboration among well-meaning, informed editors will gradually improve the encyclopedia in its breadth, depth and accuracy, and that, given enough time, the truth will win out and even subtle errors will be caught and corrected.[7] Thus, Wikipedia allows almost anyone to edit, except for users banned for persistent malfeasance after a lengthy arbitration process. Similarly, almost every article can be edited; editing is sometimes temporarily disabled for a small number of articles due to persistent vandalism or unresolved disputes among contributors. Wikipedia has not declared any of its articles "complete" or "finished".

As a general encyclopedia, Wikipedia seeks to describe as wide a range of topics as possible. It covers the subjects customarily found in traditional encyclopedias, as well as many cultural and technical topics often absent from such works. In addition to the roughly exponential growth in number of articles, the average length of each article has increased steadily,[8] as has the number of "featured articles" recognized for their high quality.[8] However, significant gaps in the project's coverage remain, and many articles lack adequate citations.[9]

One notable strength of Wikipedia is its timeliness. Traditionally, new editions of encyclopedias were released every few decades, as their information become noticeably outdated. The idea of continuous revision, in which the entire encyclopedia revised and reprinted every few years, replaced this and is now employed by most encyclopedias.[10] Wikipedia takes continuous revision to its ultimate limit — almost all articles may undergo revision at any time, allowing the project to incorporate current events. For example, the article on the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake in the English-language edition was cited frequently by the press in the days following the event.[11]

Policies and guidelines

Decisions on the content and editorial processes of Wikipedia are made largely through consensus decision-making and, occasionally, by voting; Jimmy Wales and the Wikimedia Foundation retain final judgement.[12] Wikipedia has several policies and guidelines, also developed through consensus, that guide activity on the project, covering behavioural, content-related and legal issues.[13] One of the most important states that articles must be written from a "neutral point of view",[14] presenting all noteworthy perspectives on an issue along with the evidence supporting them — thus, rather than aspiring to determine the objective truth of their subjects, articles attempt to describe them impartially from all significant viewpoints. Individual edits that contain libelous statements, copyright violations, and other content that could incur legal liability or be otherwise detrimental to Wikipedia are permanently hidden from view using a process called "oversight".[15]

Free content and licensing

Contributions to Wikipedia are covered by the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), one of the many copyleft licenses that permit the redistribution, creation of derivative works, and commercial use of content. This license allows Wikipedia's editors to retain copyright of their work, but allows others to build upon that work and republish it, as long as the original author is credited and the derivative work is likewise covered by the GFDL. This license ensures that Wikipedia can be edited freely; each author's contributions are recorded for posterity in a database. Larry Sanger has said that having the GFDL as a "guarantee of freedom is a strong motivation to work on a free encyclopedia".[16]

Wikipedia also contains images and other media that were not created by its editors, but are in the public domain. Other content on Wikipedia is released under different copyleft terms or licenses compatible with the GFDL, such as Creative Commons licenses. Still other items such as corporate logos, song samples, or copyrighted news photos are presented with a claim of fair use under the United States copyright law. The Wikimedia Commons, a media repository and sister project in which many of Wikipedia's images are stored, also allows other copyleft licenses, but does not accept fair use images.[17] Contributors may choose to multi-license their contributions under both the GFDL and the public domain, or the GFDL and other licenses, allowing third parties to use the content under any of these licenses.[18]

Wikipedia's open license fosters other innovative uses and presentations of its content. A spoken version is available for some articles in the Ogg Vorbis format,[19] as the more widely used MP3 format is covered by software patents which encumber redistribution under a free license.[20] Stand-alone versions of Wikipedia such as Lexipedia are available for handheld devices. SOS Children distributes the encyclopedia on a CD (2006 Wikipedia CD Selection). Published copies of selected Wikipedia articles are also available via PediaPress, a print on demand service.[21] A project within Wikipedia is working on "Wikipedia 1.0", a collection of Wikipedia articles that have been verified for accuracy and are ready for printing or burning to CD. The German Wikipedia has been distributed on DVD; print and digital versions of the English edition are being planned.[22]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project, Nupedia.

Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed by a formal process. Nupedia was founded on March 9 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, Inc, a web portal company. Its principal figures were Jimmy Wales, Bomis CEO, and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia. Nupedia was licensed initially under its own Nupedia Open Content License, switching to the GFDL before Wikipedia's founding at the urging of Richard Stallman.[23]

On January 10 2001, Larry Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[24] Wikipedia was formally launched on January 15 2001, as a single English-language edition at http://www.wikipedia.com/, and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[25] Wikipedia's policy of "neutral point-of-view"[14] was codified in its initial months, and was similar to Nupedia's earlier "nonbiased" policy. Otherwise, there were relatively few rules initially and Wikipedia operated independently of Nupedia.[26] Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and search engine indexing. It grew to approximately 20,000 articles, and 18 language editions, by the end of 2001. It grew to 26 language editions by the end of 2002, 46 by the end of 2003, and 161 by the end of 2004.[27] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers went down, permanently, in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia.

Wikipedia's English edition on March 30 2001, two and a half months after its founding.

Wales and Sanger attribute the concept of using a wiki to Ward Cunningham's WikiWikiWeb or Portland Pattern Repository.[citation needed] Although Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly-editable encyclopedia,[26] Sanger is usually credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[28]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control in a perceived English-centric Wikipedia, users of the Spanish Wikipedia forked from Wikipedia to create the Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002. Later that year, Wales announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and its website was moved to wikipedia.org. Various other projects have since forked from Wikipedia for editorial reasons, such as Wikinfo. New Wikipedia-inspired projects — such as Citizendium, Scholarpedia and Amapedia — have been started to address perceived limitations of Wikipedia, such as its policies on peer review, original research and commercial advertising.

The Wikimedia Foundation was created from Wikipedia and Nupedia on June 20 2003.[29]

The Wikimedia Foundation applied to the United States Patent and Trademark Office to trademark Wikipedia® on September 17 2004. The mark was granted registration status on January 10 2006. Trademark protection was accorded by Japan on December 16 2004 and in the European Union on January 20 2005. Technically a service mark, the scope of the mark is for: "Provision of information in the field of general encyclopedic knowledge via the Internet". There are plans to license the usage of the Wikipedia trademark for some products, such as books or DVDs.[30]

The number of English Wikipedia articles grew exponentially from 2002 to 2006, with a doubling time of roughly 1 year.[31]

As of 2007, Wikipedia had over 1.6 million articles, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, eclipsing even the Yongle Encyclopedia (1407), which held the record for nearly 600 years.[32]

Authorship and management

During December 2005, about 27,000 users made at least five edits to Wikipedia; of these, 17,000 worked on the English edition.[33] Maintenance tasks are performed by a group of volunteers; these include developers, who work on the MediaWiki software, and other trusted users with various permission levels including "steward", "bureaucrat" and "administrator".[34] Stewards and bureaucrats are able to promote or demote users to different permission levels. Administrators are the largest group of specially privileged users, and have the ability to prevent articles from being edited, delete pages, or block users from editing in accordance with community policy.[35] These permissions are normally granted by community consensus; stewards are elected at irregular intervals. Vandalism or the minor infraction of policies may result in a warning or temporary block, while long-term or permanent blocks for prolonged and serious infractions are given by (or in the name of) Jimmy Wales or, on the English-language edition, an elected "Arbitration Committee".[36]

Wikipedia is funded through the Wikimedia Foundation. Its 4th Quarter 2005 costs were $321,000 USD, with hardware making up almost 60% of the budget.[37] The Wikimedia Foundation currently relies primarily on private donations, and holds regular fundraisers;[38] the January 2007 fundraiser raised just over $1 million.[39]

Software and hardware

Wikipedia receives between 10,000 and 30,000 page requests per second, depending on time of day.[40] More than 100 servers have been set up to handle the traffic.

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, open source wiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database. The software incorporates modern programming features, such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License and used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double brackets were incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Overview of system architecture, May 2006. Source: Server layout diagrams on Meta-Wiki.

Wikipedia runs on dedicated clusters of Linux servers in Florida and in four other locations.[41] Wikipedia employed a single server until 2004, when the server setup was expanded into a distributed multitier architecture. In January 2005, the project ran on 39 dedicated servers located in Florida. This configuration included a single master database server running MySQL, multiple slave database servers, 21 web servers running the Apache HTTP Server, and seven Squid cache servers. By September 2005, its server cluster had grown to around 100 servers in four locations around the world.

Page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Squid caching servers. Requests that cannot be served from the Squid cache are sent to load-balancing servers running the Perlbal software, which in turn pass the request to one of the Apache web servers for page-rendering from the database. The web servers deliver pages as requested, performing page rendering for all the language editions of Wikipedia. To increase speed further, rendered pages for anonymous users are cached in a filesystem until invalidated, allowing page rendering to be skipped entirely for most common page accesses. To further accelerate response times, Wikimedia is building a global network of caching servers, beginning with three caching servers in France. Two larger clusters in the Netherlands and Korea now handle much of Wikipedia's traffic load. However, fluctuations in traffic can sometimes result in slow page load times.[citation needed]

Language editions

Wikipedia in Hebrew.[42]

Wikipedia has been described as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[43] There are presently 250 language editions of Wikipedia; of these, the top 12 have over 100,000 articles and the top 128 have over 1,000 articles.[1] According to Alexa Internet's audience measurement service, the English subdomain (en.wikipedia.org) receives approximately 55% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining 45% split among the other languages.[2] The various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view," though they may diverge on subtler points of policy and practice.

The editing of the language editions is not coordinated, and articles of one edition need not match their counterparts in another editions. Multilingual editors of sufficient fluency are encouraged to manually translate articles; automated translation of articles is explicitly disallowed.[44] Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions.[45] Articles available in one more than one language offer "InterWiki" links in their left margins, which link to the counterpart articles in other editions. Images and other non-verbal media are shared among the various language editions through the Wikimedia Commons repository.

Reliability and bias

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Wikipedia appeals to the authority of peer-reviewed publications rather than the personal authority of experts.[46] Wikipedia does not require that its contributors give their legal names[47] or provide other information to establish their identity.[48] Although some contributors are authorities in their field, Wikipedia requires that even their contributions be supported by published sources.[46] A drawback of this citation-only approach is that readers may be unable to judge the credibility of a cited source.[citation needed]

Wikipedia tries to address the proplem of systemic bias, and to deal with zealous editors who seek to influence the presentation of an article in a biased way, by insisting on a neutral point of view.[14] The English-language Wikipedia has introduced a scale against which the quality of articles is judged;[49] other editons have also adopted this. Roughly 1200 have passed a rigorous set of criteria to reach the highest rank, "featured article" status; such articles are intended to provide a thorough, well-written coverage of their topic, and be supported by many references to peer-reviewed publications.[50]

Academic evaluation

Studies suggest that Wikipedia provides a good starting point for research, but sometimes suffers from significant omissions and inaccuracies.[51] An investigation by Nature compared Wikipedia to the Encyclopædia Britannica and suggested a similar level of accuracy;[52] however, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., described this study as "fatally flawed",[53] to which Nature later responded.[54] Other studies have concluded that Wikipedia's coverage of history is significantly broader and deeper than that of Encarta, while being just as accurate,[55] and that obvious vandalism is usually reverted quickly.[56] In a study of Wikipedia as a community, economics professor Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in wiki software create a catalyst for collaborative development, and that a "creative construction" approach encourages participation.[57] Wikipedia has been viewed as a social experiment; founder Jimmy Wales has stated that it is not intended as one, though that is a consequence.[58]

Criticism and controversy

Main article: Criticism of Wikipedia

Wikipedia has been accused of exhibiting systemic bias and inconsistency;[59] Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature, and favouring consensus over credentials in its editorial process, makes it unauthoritative, and that a lack of proper sources for much of the information makes it unreliable.[60] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia is usually reliable, but that it is not always clear how much.[61] The project's preference for consensus over credentials has been labelled "anti-elitism".[62] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[63] Many university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[64] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations.[65] Founder Jimmy Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate as primary sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[66] Technology writer Bill Thompson commented that the debate was possibly "symptomatic of much learning about information which is happening in society today."[67]

Concerns have also been raised regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[68] and that it is vulnerable to vandalism and Internet trolls.[69] False information was introduced into the biography of John Seigenthaler, Sr. and remained undetected for four months.[70]

The addition of political spin to articles by organizations including the U.S. House of Representatives and special interest groups[71] has been noted,[72] and organizations such as Microsoft have offered financial incentives to improve certain articles.[73]

Wikipedia's community has been described as "cult-like",[74] although not always with entirely negative connotations,[75] and criticised for failing to accommodate inexperienced users.[76]

Wikipedia has been parodied by its critics, notably by Stephen Colbert in The Colbert Report.[77]

Wikipedia's content policies[13] and sub-projects set up by contributors seek to address these concerns.[78]

Scholarly studies have concluded that vandalism is generally short-lived,[56] and that Wikipedia is roughly as accurate as other online encyclopedias.[55]

Awards

Wikipedia won two major awards in May 2004.[79] The first was a Golden Nica for Digital Communities of the annual Prix Ars Electronica contest; this came with a €10,000 ($12,700) grant and an invitation to present at the PAE Cyberarts Festival in Austria later that year. The second was a Judges' Webby Award for the "community" category.[80] Wikipedia was also nominated for a "Best Practices" Webby. In September 2004, the Japanese Wikipedia was awarded a Web Creation Award from the Japan Advertisers Association. This award, normally given to individuals for great contributions to the Web in Japanese, was accepted by a long-standing contributor on behalf of the project.

In a 2006 Multiscope research study, the Dutch Wikipedia was rated the third best Dutch language site, after Google and Gmail, with a score of 8.1.[81] On 26 January 2007, Wikipedia was also awarded the fourth highest brand ranking by the readers of [brandchannel.com], receiving 15% of the votes in answer to the question "Which brand had the most impact on our lives in 2006?"[82] Founder Jimmy Wales was named one of the 100 most influential people in the world by TIME Magazine in 2006.[83]

In the media

Main article: Wikipedia in popular culture

Wikipedia's content has been mirrored and forked by hundreds of sites including database dumps. Wikipedia content has also been used in academic studies, books and conferences.[84] Wikipedia has also been used in court cases,[85] and the Parliament of Canada website refers to Wikipedia's article on same-sex marriage in the "further reading" list of Civil Marriage Act.[86] Wikipedia maintains a (non-comprehensive) list of such uses.[87] Wikipedia's assertions are increasingly used as a source by organizations such as the U.S. Federal courts and the World Intellectual Property Office[88] — though mainly for supporting information rather than information decisive to a case.[89] Wikipedia has also been used as a source in journalism,[90] sometimes without attribution; several reporters have been dismissed for plagiarizing from Wikipedia.[91][92]

With increased usage and awareness, there have been an increasing number of references to Wikipedia in popular culture. Many parody Wikipedia's openness, with characters vandalizing or modifying the online encyclopedia project's articles. Uncyclopedia is the largest such website; its Main Page claims that it is the "content-free encyclopedia that anyone can edit,"[93] parodying the English Wikipedia's welcome message on its [[Main Page|Main Page]]. In the episode "Wikiality" of The Colbert Report, host Stephen Colbert has instigated his viewers to vandalize articles in humorous ways, once doing so on the Wikipedia article on elephants.[94] "Weird Al" Yankovic's character in his video 'White & Nerdy' is seen vandalising the entry for the Atlantic record label with the exclamation "You suck!," after they rescinded permission for a parody.[95]

Wikipedia has spawned several sister projects. The first, "In Memoriam: September 11 Wiki", created in October 2002,[96] detailed the September 11, 2001 attacks; this project was closed in October 2006 and is no longer managed by the Wikimedia Foundation.[97] Wiktionary, a dictionary project, was launched in December 2002;[98] Wikiquote, a collection of quotations, a week after Wikimedia launched; and Wikibooks, a collection of collaboratively-written free books, the next month. Wikimedia has since started a number of other projects.[99]

A similar non-wiki project, the GNUpedia project, co-existed with Nupedia early in its history; however, it has been retired and its creator, free-software figure Richard Stallman, has lent his support to Wikipedia.[100]

Other websites centered around collaborative knowledge base development have drawn inspiration from or inspired Wikipedia. Some, such as Susning.nu, Enciclopedia Libre, and WikiZnanie likewise employ no formal review process, whereas others use more traditional peer review, such as the expert-written Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, h2g2 and Everything2.

References

  1. ^ a b "List of Wikipedias", Meta-Wiki (January 24 2007). Retrieved on 2007-01-31.
  2. ^ a b "Five-year traffic statistics for wikipedia.org, Alexa Internet. Retrieved on 29 January 2007.
  3. ^ "Three-month traffic statistics for wikipedia.org, Alexa Internet. Retrieved on 29 January 2007.
  4. ^ Wikipedia:Categorical index - English Wikipedia, retrieved on 2007-01-27
  5. ^ Wikipedia:Portal - English Wikipedia, retrieved on 2007-01-27
  6. ^ Wikipedia:Why create an account - English Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-29.
  7. ^ "Wikipedia sociology", Meta-Wiki, 23:30 March 24 2006
  8. ^ a b English Wikipedia statistics, English Wikipedia, retrieved on 2007-01-29 Cite error: The named reference "WP_stats" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  9. ^ WikiProject Fact and Reference Check, English Wikipedia, retrieved on 2007-02-03
  10. ^ Kogan, Herman (1958). The Great EB: The Story of the Encyclopædia Britannica. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Library of Congress catalog number 58-8379.
  11. ^ Cited by Workers World (January 8 2005) and Chicago Times (January 16 2005)
  12. ^ "Power structure", Meta-Wiki, 10:55 April 4 2005
  13. ^ a b "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines List of policies and guidelines]", English Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-31.
  14. ^ a b c "Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia (21 January 2007)
  15. ^ "Hiding revisions", Meta-Wiki (January 14, 2007)
  16. ^ Larry Sanger, "Britannica or Nupedia? The Future of Free Encyclopedias", Kuro5hin, July 25 2001.
  17. ^ "Licensing", Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved on 2007-01-30.
  18. ^ "Wikipedia:Multi-licensing", Wikipedia (December 13 2006)
  19. ^ "Wikipedia:Media", Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-02-01.
  20. ^ "MP3 Patent Portfolio", mp3licensing.com (May 10 2006). Retrieved January 14, 2007
  21. ^ PediaPress Retrieved 27 December 2006
  22. ^ "Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team", Wikipedia (24 January 2007)
  23. ^ Richard Stallman (1999). "The Free Encyclopedia Project". Free Software Foundation.
  24. ^ Larry Sanger (January 10 2001). "Let's make a wiki". Internet Archive. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  25. ^ Larry Sanger (January 17 2001). "Wikipedia is up!". Internet Archive. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  26. ^ a b Larry Sanger (April 18 2005). "The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir". Slashdot. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  27. ^ "Multilingual statistics", Wikipedia, March 30 2005
  28. ^ Wikipedia-l: LinkBacks?
  29. ^ Jimmy Wales: "Announcing Wikimedia Foundation", June 20 2003, <wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org>
  30. ^ Nair, Vipin (December 5 2005). "Growing on volunteer power". Business Line. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ "Wikipedia:Modelling Wikipedia's growth",English Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-29.
  32. ^ "Encyclopedias and Dictionaries". Encyclopædia Britannica, 15th ed. Vol. 18. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007. pp. 257–286.
  33. ^ Paragraph's statistics taken from "Active wikipedians" (Wikipedia Statistics, April 13 2006).
  34. ^ "Wikipedia:User access levels", Wikipedia (January 12, 2007)
  35. ^ "Wikipedia:Administrators", Wikipedia (January 23, 2007)
  36. ^ "Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee", Wikipedia (23 January 2007)
  37. ^ "Budget/2005". Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 2006-03-11.
  38. ^ Fundraising, Wikimedia Foundation
  39. ^ "Fundraising report", Wikimedia Foundation (January 21 2007)
  40. ^ "Monthly request statistics", Wikimedia. Retrieved on 2007-02-03.
  41. ^ Wikimedia servers at wikimedia.org
  42. ^ Main Page, Hebrew Wikipedia
  43. ^ Jimmy Wales, "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia", March 8 2005, <wikipedia-l@wikimedia.org>
  44. ^ Wikipedia: Translation. English Wikipedia, accessed on 2007-02-03
  45. ^ For example, "Translation into English", Wikipedia. (March 9, 2005)
  46. ^ a b "Wikipedia:Reliable sources", English Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-27.
  47. ^ "Wikipedia:Username", English Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-29.
  48. ^ "Wikipedia:Privacy", English Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-29.
  49. ^ "Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment", Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-27.
  50. ^ "Featured article criteria", Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-27.
  51. ^ "Wikipedia survives research test". BBC News. BBC. December 15, 2005. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  52. ^ "Internet encyclopaedias go head to head", Nature, 14 December 2005
  53. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. (March 22, 2006). "Fatally Flawed: Refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal Nature" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  54. ^ "Nature's responses to Encyclopaedia Britannica", Nature (March 30 2006). Retrieved on 2007-02-01.
  55. ^ a b Rosenzweig, Roy (2006). "Can History be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past". The Journal of American History. 93: 117–146.
  56. ^ a b "Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with History Flow Visualizations" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-01-24. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  57. ^ Andrea Ciffolilli, "Phantom authority, self-selective recruitment and retention of members in virtual communities: The case of Wikipedia", First Monday December 2003.
  58. ^ Jimmy Wales, "Re: Illegitimate block", January 26 2005, <wikien-l@wikimedia.org>.
  59. ^ Simon Waldman, http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/news/0,12597,1335892,00.html Who knows?, The Guardian, October 26 2004
  60. ^ Stacy Schiff (2006-07-31). "Know It All". The New Yorker. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  61. ^ Danah Boyd, "Academia and Wikipedia", Many-to-Many, January 4 2005.
  62. ^ Larry Sanger, "Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism", Kuro5hin, December 31 2004.
  63. ^ Robert McHenry, "The Faith-Based Encyclopedia", Tech Central Station, November 15 2004.
  64. ^ "Wide World of WIKIPEDIA". The Emory Wheel. April 21 2006. Retrieved 2007-01-25. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  65. ^ "A Stand Against Wikipedia", Inside Higher Ed (January 26 2007). Retrieved on January 27 2007.
  66. ^ Wikipedia: "A Work in Progress", BusinessWeek (December 14, 2005). Retrieved on 2007-01-29.
  67. ^ Thompson, Bill (2005-12-16). "What is it with Wikipedia?". BBC. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  68. ^ Public Information Research - Wikipedia Watch. Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
  69. ^ "Toward a New Compendium of Knowledge (longer version)". Citizendium.org. Retrieved 2006-10-10.
  70. ^ Seigenthaler, John (2005-11-29). "A False Wikipedia 'biography'". USA Today. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  71. ^ Ahrens, Frank (2006-07-09). "Death by Wikipedia: The Kenneth Lay Chronicles". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2006-11-01.
  72. ^ Kane, Margaret (2006-01-30). "Politicians notice Wikipedia". CNET. Retrieved 2007-01-28.
  73. ^ Bergstein, Brian (2007-01-23). "Microsoft offers cash for Wikipedia edit". MSNBC. Retrieved 2007-02-01. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  74. ^ Arthur, Charles (2005-12-15). "Log on and join in, but beware the web cults". The Guardian. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  75. ^ Lu Stout, Kristie (2003-08-04). "Wikipedia: The know-it-all Web site". CNN. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  76. ^ "Wikinfo (2005-03-30). "Critical views of Wikipedia". Retrieved 2007-01-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  77. ^ Caroline McCarthy (2006-08-01). "Colbert speaks, America follows: All Hail Wikiality!". c-net news.com.
  78. ^ "Wikipedia:WikiProject", English Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-01-29.
  79. ^ "Trophy Box", Meta-Wiki (March 28 2005).
  80. ^ "Webby Awards 2004"
  81. ^ "Nederlandse Wikipedia groeit als kool (Website in Dutch Language), Recovered December 27, 2006
  82. ^ "Similar Search Results: Google Wins", Interbrand (January 29 2007). Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
  83. ^ "Jimmy Wales in Time 100", TIME, 08:58 December 18 2006.
  84. ^ "Wikipedia:Wikipedia in the media", Wikipedia
  85. ^ Bourgeois et al v. Peters et al.
  86. ^ "C-38", LEGISINFO (March 28 2005)
  87. ^ "Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a source", Wikipedia
  88. ^ Arias, Martha L. (29 January 2007). "Wikipedia: The Free Online Encyclopedia and its Use as Court Source". Internet Business Law Services. {{cite journal}}: External link in |title= (help)
  89. ^ Cohen, Noam (29 January 2007). "Courts Turn to Wikipedia, but Selectively". New York Times. {{cite news}}: External link in |title= (help)
  90. ^ "Basayev: Russia's most wanted man", CNN, 8 September 2004.
  91. ^ "Express-News staffer resigns after plagiarism in column is discovered", San Antonio Express-News, 9 January 2007.
  92. ^ "Inquiry prompts reporter's dismissal", Honolulu Star-Bulletin, 13 January 2007.
  93. ^ "Main Page", uncyclopedia.org (as of January 26 2007). Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
  94. ^ "Colbert Causes Chaos on Wikipedia". Newsvine. August 1 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-28. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  95. ^ "Weird Al Yankovic," Herald Sun, October 5 2006. Retrieved on 2007-01-25.
  96. ^ First edit to the wiki In Memoriam: September 11 wiki (October 28, 2002)
  97. ^ "In Memoriam", In Memoriam: September 11 Wiki (October 31 2006)
  98. ^ "Announcement of Wiktionary's creation", December 12 2002. Retrieved on 2007-02-02.
  99. ^ "Our projects", Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved on 2007-01-24
  100. ^ Richard Stallman (1999). "The Free Encyclopedia Project". Free Software Foundation.

See also

Template:Sisterlinkqsc

Listen to this article
(2 parts, 33 minutes)
  2. Part 2
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated
Error: no date provided
, and do not reflect subsequent edits.
(Audio help · More spoken articles)

Template:Link FA ru-sib:Википеддя

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=105393192"