Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Michael of Yugoslavia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 02:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Michael of Yugoslavia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, looks like deposed monarchy cruft. PatGallacher (talk) 14:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails WP:NBIO and definitely fails WP:NPOL. Important to remember WP:NOTINHERETED. Current sources in the article are passing references or primary sources (the NYT piece actually kind of pokes fun at the Prince for being an inconsequential society figure: "How come he spells his name in French?") and don't give WP:SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE does not uncover any sources but this source does says "as far as I have been able to ascertain, Prince Michael of Yugoslavia does not exist." I think that sums it up. Vladimir.copic (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eternal Shadow Talk 19:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Karađorđević dynasty. Kathlene Smoot (talk) 19:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find some coverages to say that he meets WP:GNG. He involved in a notable scandal which provides him media attention [1] [2] and [3] [4]. This Bilan article [5] is an in-depth coverage about him. VocalIndia (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As someone from that general region, I can confidently say that this is not a person any decent number of people would recognize. Still, he was featured in B92 two weeks ago. He's a photographer and supposedly had some exhibition in South Korea. [6] --Killuminator (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.