Talk:Dharwar Craton
Geology Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Comments from Yuki
Hi Lawrence
I think your page is quite comprehensive.
I think the introduction serves its function well and I can quickly grasp what the page is talking about just by reading the introduction.
For organization, I think it is well-organized and the tables are effective in helping the readers to sort out the information they need. However, for the part of "Formation and Evolution", I think you can add some indicator to indicates which step it is in for each sub-headings, such as "Stage 1: ...".
For the visuals, I think they really summarized the formation process really well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wongtszyanyuki (talk • contribs) 04:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments from Triton
Hi Lawrence
You have illustrated the main concepts clearly.
However, I think your organization has rooms for improvement. Sections "Archean crust accretions" and "Crustal reworking events" are better placed under "Formation and evolution". Also, you should tell people the implications of the "Metamorphic record(s)".
I like the tables in the article though, they are very organized. But there could be more in the overview part to compare the groups within the craton. The diagrams are effective, but "lithosphere" should be clarified as "lithospheric mantle"; while slab rollback should be annotated.
There are some but not serious grammatical errors e.g. plural form of "plateau" should be "plateaux"; "large scale bimodal greenstone" should be written as "large-scale bimodal greenstone".Triton Chiu63 (talk) 08:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments from Rachel
Hi Lawrence,
I think your article is very organised and you make good use of tables. For the location map of Dharwar Craton, I think you may label the map to make it clearer. For Intraplate hotspot model, you may explain it a bit more.
Rachel:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachelhunggg (talk • contribs) 20:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)