Jump to content

User:Sray13/Social influence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sray13 (talk | contribs) at 19:51, 19 November 2021 (added information and a link). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The content of the article was relevant to the topic and very well developed. There was a thorough explanation of each main point as well providing additional information relevant to the topic. This article was written from a neutral and informative standpoint. Each citation checked seemed to be from a reputable source. The article itself is not based on one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. However, it does touch on ethnicity and gender being impacted by social influence. So social influence does effect equity gaps but is not an equity gap itself.

Lead

Article body

Researchers have been studying social influence and minority influence for over thirty years. The first publication covering these topics was written by social psychologist Serge Moscovici and published in 1976.[1]Minority influence takes place when a majority is influenced to accept the beliefs or behaviors of a minority. Minority influence can be affected by the sizes of majority and minority groups, the level of consistency of the minority group, and situational factors (such as the affluence or social importance of the minority).[2] Minority influence most often operates through informational social influence (as opposed to normative social influence) because the majority may be indifferent to the liking of the minority.[3]

Social contagion involves the spontaneous spread of behaviors or emotions through a group, population or social network. Unlike conformity, the emotion or behavior being adopted may not represent a social norm.[4]

Appeals to authority may especially effect norms of obedience.

Behaviors

Obedience is a form of social influence that derives from an authority figure, based on order or command.[5] The Milgram experiment, Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment, and the Hofling hospital experiment are three particularly well-known experiments on obedience, and they all conclude that humans are surprisingly obedient in the presence of perceived legitimate authority figures.

Social Contagion:Social contagion involves the spontaneous spread of behaviors or emotions through a group, population or social network. Social contagion is comprised of two categories, behavioral contagion and emotional contagion. Unlike conformity, the emotion or behavior being adopted may not represent a social norm.

Abusive power and control:

Controlling abusers use various tactics to exert power and control over their victims. Tactics may include coercion and threats, intimidation, emotional abuse, isolation, and more. The goal of the abuser is to control and intimidate the victim or to influence them to feel that they do not have an equal voice in the relationship.



Peer Review Summary

-Made spelling corrections suggested by Nikigb and will be taking the suggestion to add more current sources at a later date.

-Made spelling corrections suggested by Sab3434


References

  1. ^   Mucchi-Faina, A., Pacilli, M. G., & Pagliaro, S. (2010). Minority Influence, Social Change, and Social Stability. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00314.x
  2. ^ Moscovici, S. and Nemeth (1974) Minority influence. In C. Nemetn (ed.), Social psychology: Classic and contemporary integrations (pp. 217–249), Chicago:Rand McNally
  3. ^ Wood, W.; Lundgren, S.; Ouellette, J.; Busceme, S. & Blackstone, T. (1994). "Minority Influence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Social Influence Processes". Psychological Bulletin. 115 (3): 323–345. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323. PMID 8016284.
  4. ^ Stephen G. Harkins; Kipling D. Williams; Jerry M. Burger, eds. (2017). "7 , 23". The Oxford Handbook of Social Influence. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199859870.
  5. ^   Gibson, S. (2019). Obedience without orders: Expanding social psychology’s conception of “obedience.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12272

I have little in terms of commentary specific to your current edits. They are looking good so far! I am curious how you see things evolving from here? Will you be bringing in more historical reference? (Liz)