Talk:Kirwan Health Campus

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Kirwan Health Campus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speedy delete notice

The Kirwan Health Campus is a major piece of Government infrastructure and it is probably the second biggest facility in the Townsville Health District. Cheers, Wiki Townsvillia n 08:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With due respect, how major can it really be particularly when it only has self-references to the content? No notable information has been included which can be confirmed independent secondary sources, and the article has languished in this state for more months than I can remember. WP:ILIKEIT is not a good enough reason for it to be kept. Request to speedy still stands. Thewinchester ^(talk) 09:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well im so sorry i will go in tomorrow and put in other refs, i just used the one as it tells you all you need to know and i have a life, plus is this a pick on me now is it? or just Thuringowa.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thuringowacityrep (talk • contribs) 10:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't saying that this article should stay because I like it, I was saying that it is a notable facility, the only criteria for notability is that there is enough reference material in existence to build up a featured article on it. Quite clearly there would be in this case were some editors to put a whole heap of work into it. 'I don't like it' is not a reason to mark things for speedy deletions, while I agree some of the things TCR is fighting you on might not be legit, and I also acknowledge that you are making some really positive contributions to Townsville/Thuringowa related articles, but don't loose your higher ground by picking fights with him without being able to back it up. Cheers, Wiki Townsvillia n 11:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ps there are 687 results from Google for "Kirwan Health Campus", that alone should establish notability.