Talk:Ifeoma Ozoma

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

African diaspora

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Influence on WA Legislation

One of the sources cited on Cher Scarlett's work on legislative work in Washington state is a profile about Ozoma.^[1] I believe it make sense to re-instate that here, given that context.SquareInARoundHole (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Woo, Erin (24 November 2021). "A Tech Whistle-Blower Helps Others Speak Out". Retrieved 29 November 2021.

This page mentions as is that Ifeoma "authorized" and "sponsored" Silence No More Legislation. While she was an inspiration and powerful advocate for the legislation, my understanding is that citizens can't sponsor and authorize legislation; those are actions of the legislators who supported the bill. She's not, for example, listed as a "sponsor" of the bill on the bill's official page: https://legiscan.com/CA/sponsors/SB331/2021 Thistechworkertoo (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the footnote? The "sponsor" wording is explained there. It also says she "authored" (not "authorized") the bill. Both descriptors, by the way, are supported in the inline citations. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm so sorry for misreading the "authored" text! Also, unfortunately the footnote that was recently added is under paywall and from over ten years ago. It could be though that California is an exception here and I'm not aware of it. Just double checking that the correct language is being used so there isn't confusion for others trying to mirror this important work in other states. Are there other supporting references here that speak to a citizen being able to "sponsor" legislation in the same way that legislators do? Thistechworkertoo (talk) 01:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd, I'm not hitting a paywall. Regardless, that source in the footnote just explains the terminology that is unusual; the other two sources (The Hill and The Verge, at the end of the sentence) support that Ozoma is a "cosponsor". GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reporters don't always understand the legislative process and regurgitate whatever language is told to them or will get the most attention and clicks. I think it's important that we fact check via government sources that it's appropriate to state that Silence No More California legislation was sponsored by Ifeoma vs. inspired and informed by her; the official bill page doesn't list her as a "sponsor". Either way she obviously had an important and critical role in passing the legislation. Thistechworkertoo (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We reflect what reliable sources write. You are free to find a RS supporting that this naming has changed in the past ten years, but until then it should stay as it is. That said, it seems pretty easily verified that this is still the case: "SPONSOR: The legislator, private individual, or group who developed a piece of legislation and advocates its passage." [1] GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Woo, Erin (24 November 2021). "A Tech Whistle-Blower Helps Others Speak Out". Retrieved 29 November 2021.

[1]

Influence on WA Legislation

Potential incorrect use of the language "sponsor" ?