Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawna Lenee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shawna Lenee

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being quoted as opposing a tax rise isn’t actually any basis for us to host a BLP and the article no longer exists. Otherwise what we have as sources is utterly hopeless. Fails GNG and ENT Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails all current notability guidelines. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 00:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks sufficient independent RS coverage to pass WP:BASIC and no reliably sourced evidence of passing WP:ENTERTAINER. References in the article are junk. An independent search for RS coverage yielded quotes by the subject and a short puff piece at glavred.info. • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.