Talk:Chris Cuomo

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chris Cuomo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 6 months

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Journalism B‑class Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television B‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state) B‑class Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City B‑class Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States B‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

March 29 to April 4, 2020 (17th)

This article reads like Chris Cuomo himself wrote it.

No mention of Chris's attacks on a innocent teenager, who was not a political figure and under the age of 18 - Nick Sandmann. No mention of Chris being caught outside of his home not quarantining and had Covid at the time, and not wearing a mask, while on a daily basis on his show he lectures the public to wear masks even outdoors and take the virus seriously. The man was caught writing excuses for his Governor brother, again no mention. Conveniently enough however, the article mentions that Chris was called a name that hurt his feelings and makes sure to mention that he thinks it's equivalent to the N word...awww poor Chris. 2600:1700:1EC1:30C0:68F9:C8E9:E5F5:2F (talk)

Hello. We don't include trivia or poorly sourced contentious material in Wikipedia articles, particularly not in articles about living people. Please see the relevant notice at the top of this page, and/or read WP:BLP. -- Softlavender (talk) 02:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Cuomo used his media sources to find out info on brother Andrew’s accusers

Should information from this article, CNN host Chris Cuomo used his media sources to find out info on brother Andrew’s accusers, records show be used in the article? Is this news article about Chris or about Andrew?Whoisjohngalt (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no comments or a reach of consensus, then I will add the information from this article back into the article.Whoisjohngalt (talk) 15:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why your addition was removed, but obviously it's worthy of inclusion and the section regarding the coverage of his brother is due for a significant expansion. CNN says it's conducting a "thorough review"[1] of documents related to the investigation and called the role Chris took in advising Andrew "intimate." A few sample texts would be good to include, along with a note that so far Chris has not addressed the revelations. Incerto501 (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I concur that it's absolutely relevant to him. I'd say we ought to aim for a normal-sized level-3 subsection in the body and a brief mention in the lead within the sentence on Andrew Cuomo being his brother. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 21:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies

I feel like the Wikileaks subsection gets pretty close to the article just listing objectionable things Chris Cuomo has said as controversies - which is going to end up making this page a mile-long and not super helpful for folks looking for information regarding Chris Cuomo. Obviously, Cuomo has attracted a sort of hatedom[2] on the political right - hence, I think, the flurry of recent edits to this article. Perhaps it might be better to have a subsection regarding that with some illustrative examples (there's definitely a reason his sometimes half-cocked comments made him a bit of a punching bag), rather than indulging in a pile-on of anti-Cuomo subheaders. Would be a bit delicate to pull off well, but that's my two cents. LookOnMyEditsYeMighty^(talk) 13:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the WikiLeaks material entirely, as it did not meet WP:DUE. WP:CRIT says controversies sections that are of the "mixed bag" kind are inappropriate, which is clearly the case here. Some of the Andrew Cuomo-related material doesn't seem to be controversial (e.g., the subject interviewing him and not reporting on the allegations against him), so we should not present it as if sources regard it as such. KyleJoan^talk 13:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I think that's a sensible way to deal with it. LookOnMyEditsYeMighty^(talk) 20:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "Chris Cuomo is a CNN anchor" to "Chris Cuomo was a CNN anchor". He was just fired it's all over the news 2601:648:8201:41F0:BC6C:F12D:1217:BF77 (talk) 19:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: He is currently suspended, not fired. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stopping Short - Sexual harassment allegation

Re: Stopping short of asking him to be fired from CNN...

1) This source (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/24/former-abc-producer-accuses-chris-cuomo-of-sexual-harassment) states:

              Ross said she did not want Cuomo to lose his job. “I hope he stays at CNN forever if he chooses,” she said.

Saying 'she did not want him to lose his job' is more definite than 'stopping short of asking him to be fired from CNN...'

2) The wikipedia entry is also grammatically incorrect. It should be something like:

              Stopping short of asking that he be fired from CNN...

3) Suggestion:

              Though she did not want him to be fired from CNN, she said she would "like to see him journalistically repent."

94.126.214.7 (talk) 08:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was

Someone change that is to was on the first line 2603:8081:D02:2801:11FE:5530:8644:8363 (talk) 18:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cuomo is still alive and still a journalist, just not currently employed (as the sentences immediately following make clear). ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 00:11, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forwarding Documents

According to Fox : Additionally, the transcript from investigators' interview with Democratic strategist and Andrew Cuomo ally Lis Smith showed Chris Cuomo had forwarded her documents regarding the governor's second accuser Charlotte Bennett and her "time in college.". Should this be placed on the article? While the article have stated that Cuomo used journalistic sources, sending documents is more concise and clearer and should be placed on the article. Thoughts? SunDawn talk 23:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't seem noteworthy. I don't know it would help readers that much to read: "Cuomo used his media sources to uncover information about his brother's accusers. He sent information about one of the accusers' activities in college to one of his brother's allies." The relevant point is that Cuomo participated in the dirt-digging, so to speak. Obviously the information would be passed around. KyleJoan^talk 00:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate reasoning stated for termination

The page isn't entirely correct about why CNN decided to terminate Cuomo on Saturday:

On December 4, after an internal review conducted by a law firm, CNN terminated Cuomo's employment and said they would investigate Cuomo's "involvement with his brother's defense"

Basically it implies that he was terminated only for the incident of his involvement with his brother Andrew, which is not accurate. Here's what the cited source says:

CNN said in a statement: "Chris Cuomo was suspended earlier this week pending further evaluation of new information that came to light about his involvement with his brother's defense. We retained a respected law firm to conduct the review, and have terminated him, effective immediately." "While in the process of that review, additional information has come to light," CNN's statement added. "Despite the termination, we will investigate as appropriate."

NPR has more details about the allegations: https://www.npr.org/2021/12/05/1061639233/chris-cuomo-newly-fired-from-cnn-faces-an-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct

In other words, they didn't terminate him only for his journalistic misconduct, but when new information (including documentary evidence) about the sexual misconduct allegations came to light, they decided to terminate him. So that bit should read something like:

On December 4th, CNN abruptly terminated Cuomo's employment citing additional previously unannounced sexual misconduct allegations that they received earlier in the week, which are unrelated to his alleged journalistic misconduct. CNN is currently investigating those allegations further. 97.124.152.48 (talk) 01:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While the sexual allegation may be a factor of CNN's termination, it is not a proven fact. SunDawn talk 15:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the full story behind his firing. But, he'll likely be eventually hired by MSNBC news. GoodDay (talk) 19:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really an internal review if it's conducted by an external law firm?

Sorry if this is nitpicking, but the article currently says, "an internal review conducted by a law firm". Is it really an internal review if it's conducted by an external law firm? A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 22:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A interesting point you bring up, however in the fox news cited WP:RS it does specifically say "internal review" so, I'm not sure. You maybe could use WP:COMMONSENSE to edit it out, and see if anybody else reverts it? MaximusEditor (talk) 23:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The internal v. external is determined by what's being reviewed (i.e. CNN) not who the reviewers are. So this is very much an internal review done by external reviewers. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 23:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]