User talk:Ahunter02

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ahunter02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I just saw that I was blocked from editing Wikipedia by you. I was wondering exactly what article I vandalized as I haven’t edited Wikipedia in several weeks. The last time that this was specifically mentioned was when I created my first article and I didn’t know how to operate Wikipedia at the time. The actions I took during that time was deeply regretted and it was also in 2019. I would like to resolve this issue as the edits I have made from that point on have been constructive to this haven of knowledge we all cherish. Ahunter02 (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, I just saw that I was blocked from editing Wikipedia by you. I was wondering exactly what article I vandalized as I haven’t edited Wikipedia in several weeks. The last time that this was specifically mentioned was when I created my first article and I didn’t know how to operate Wikipedia at the time. The actions I took during that time was deeply regretted and it was also in 2019. I would like to resolve this issue as the edits I have made from that point on have been constructive to this haven of knowledge we all cherish. [[User:Ahunter02|Ahunter02]] ([[User talk:Ahunter02#top|talk]]) 01:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I just saw that I was blocked from editing Wikipedia by you. I was wondering exactly what article I vandalized as I haven’t edited Wikipedia in several weeks. The last time that this was specifically mentioned was when I created my first article and I didn’t know how to operate Wikipedia at the time. The actions I took during that time was deeply regretted and it was also in 2019. I would like to resolve this issue as the edits I have made from that point on have been constructive to this haven of knowledge we all cherish. [[User:Ahunter02|Ahunter02]] ([[User talk:Ahunter02#top|talk]]) 01:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I just saw that I was blocked from editing Wikipedia by you. I was wondering exactly what article I vandalized as I haven’t edited Wikipedia in several weeks. The last time that this was specifically mentioned was when I created my first article and I didn’t know how to operate Wikipedia at the time. The actions I took during that time was deeply regretted and it was also in 2019. I would like to resolve this issue as the edits I have made from that point on have been constructive to this haven of knowledge we all cherish. [[User:Ahunter02|Ahunter02]] ([[User talk:Ahunter02#top|talk]]) 01:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Ahunter02, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ahunter02! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Lucy Mae McDonald. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 18:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Hamilton. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alexander Hamilton was changed by Ahunter02 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929096 on 2019-12-02T18:46:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lucy Mae McDonald, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. GPL93 (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Lucy Mae McDonald. GPL93 (talk) 23:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucy Mae McDonald

The article Lucy Mae McDonald has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GPL93 (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucy Mae McDonald for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucy Mae McDonald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Mae McDonald until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:46, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Union Hill, Ellis County, Texas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Union Hill, Ellis County, Texas. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ahunter02 (talk) 23:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Union Hill, Ellis County, Texas (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:GEOLAND, places without legal recognition need to establish notability by way of WP:GNG, which this appears to fall short of. (Also, written in a very ambiguous manner unsuitable for encyclopaedia.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Union Hill, Ellis County, Texas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Union Hill, Ellis County, Texas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Union Hill, Ellis County, Texas

Hello, Ahunter02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Union Hill, Ellis County, Texas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request it to be moved to my user page Ahunter02 (talk) 01:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]