Talk:Canada goose
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canada goose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Map Question
Is the map accurate I live in the southern U.S. and I would testify under oath that these pest are around for the whole year not just summer it is so bad that in some places in the middle of summer you can't go outside without stepping in their "gifts" ChrisLamb 18:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree, the range map should be rethought. Tallahassee, FL, for instance, is well-known to have a year-round population of Canada Geese (who especially enjoy defecating on FSU's intramural fields). What is the source for these range maps? 38.106.100.57 (talk) 14:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Brownsea Island recording
Are we sure this is a pure recording of geese and only geese? I think I hear seagulls... Blythwood (talk) 09:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
English spelling changes
Since it's called the Canada goose. I think the spellings should be changed to Canadian spellings. LittleJerry (talk) 22:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- That's not how it works here at Wikipedia. Articles remain in the variety of English they were started in. The sole exception to this rule is if they are about a subject restricted to an area with a particular variety of English (i.e. an article about a Canadian town would be written in Canadian English). Since this is about a goose which is found across much of the world now (an area with multiple "English varieties" -- Canadian English, American English, Australian English, British English -- it should stay as it started. And the variety it was started in was Australian English. Sorry! MeegsC (talk) 22:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canada goose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071019223411/http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2005/09/68937 to http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2005/09/68937
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Canada goose
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Canada goose's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "CRC":
- From Great horned owl: CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses by John B. Dunning Jr. (Editor). CRC Press (1992), ISBN 978-0-8493-4258-5.
- From Peregrine falcon: Dunning, John B., Jr., ed. (1992). CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-4258-5.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) - From Spur-winged goose: CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, 2nd Edition by John B. Dunning Jr. (Editor). CRC Press (2008), ISBN 978-1-4200-6444-5.
- From Greylag goose: Dunning, John B. Jr., ed. (1992). CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-4258-5.
- From Greater white-fronted goose: Dunning, John B. Jr., ed. (1992). CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-4258-5.
- From Turkey vulture: CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, 2nd Edition (2008). John B. Dunning Jr. (Editor). CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4200-6444-5.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
edibility
I think this should be expanded that commercial farmed geese are not as 'gamey' tasting, and may be slightly fattier meat. I can eat Canada goose, but it is not a favorite. Even farmed geese have lost out in a major way to turkey just about everywhere. Maybe a bit about what is usual in the preparation of wild geese of the species would be an expansion of information for the article? 50.111.44.55 (talk) 16:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- 50.111.44.55, that's fine but what we need are citations. I added this section originally and was limited by what I could find. Blythwood (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- C-Class bird articles
- Mid-importance bird articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- C-Class Caribbean articles
- Low-importance Caribbean articles
- C-Class Dominican Republic articles
- Low-importance Dominican Republic articles
- WikiProject Dominican Republic articles
- WikiProject Caribbean articles
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles