Jump to content

Re A (conjoined twins)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 195.195.18.250 (talk) at 14:53, 5 January 2022 (fixed typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Re A (conjoined twins)
CourtCourt of Appeal of England and Wales
Decided22 September 2000
Citation[2001] 2 WLR 480, [2000] 3 FCR 577, [2000] HRLR 721, [2001] Fam Law 18, [2000] Lloyd's Rep Med 425, [2001] Fam 147, [2000] EWCA Civ 254, 9 BHRC 261, (2001) 57 BMLR 1, [2000] 4 All ER 961, [2000] Lloyds Rep Med 425, [2001] 1 FLR 1, [2001] UKHRR 1
Case history
Prior actionDeclaration of lawfulness to proposed surgery in the High Court
Court membership
Judges sittingLord Justice Ward, Lord Justice Brooke, Lord Justice Robert Walker
Case opinions
Appeal dismissed; however reasoning of single judge disapproved, decision made on fresh basis.
Keywords
  • Necessity
  • Medical law
  • moral dilemma
  • surgery bringing about death of weaker conjoined twin, i like turtles :)
  • lawfulness

Re A (conjoined twins) [2001] 2 WLR 480[1] is a Court of Appeal decision on the separation of conjoined twins. The case raised legal and ethical dilemmas. It was ruled it would be permissible to sever and thus kill in a palliative, sympathetic manner the weaker to save the much stronger.[2] The case was among those where it would be lawful to act—conduct surgery—against the wishes of the parents. The prevailing orthodoxy within a faith, even that of the parents, was held not to be overriding, nor general applicability of the outcome to all such cases.

Facts

Rosie and Gracie Attard, who were born on 8 August 2000, were conjoined twins who were joined at the abdomen.[3] During legal deliberations, they were given the public pseudonyms Jodie and Mary, respectively.[4] The medical evidence proved Gracie as stronger sibling, sustaining the life of Rosie; Rosie had survived birth due to a shared common artery supplied by Gracie. If surgically separated, Gracie had a 94% survival rate with little margin of error, but Rosie was guaranteed to die. If left conjoined, then their life expectancy—fast deteriorating—would be, with low margin of error, six months.

Reasons of judgment and appeal decision

At first instance, Justice Johnson was left to decide the case without any direct precedents to bind nor guide him.[5] The law requires reasoning by analogy (abstraction) of precedent case law. He chose primarily Airedale NHS Trust v Bland where it was declared acceptable to remove life support. He ruled separation would not be murder but a case of "passive euthanasia" in which food and hydration would be withdrawn.[6]

The Court of Appeal agreed in outcome but rejected this analysis. The three appellate judges gave contrasting legal reasoning. Lord Justice Alan Ward invoked the concept of self-defence suggesting that "If [Gracie] could speak she would surely protest, Stop it, [Rosie], you're killing me."[6] Lord Justice Brooke relied upon R v Dudley and Stephens and invoked necessity as a defence. Lord Justice Robert Walker focused upon the morally understandable intention of the surgeons, and the great body of profession opinion, in concluding that surgery could go ahead.[5]

Result

The 20-hour-long operation to separate the twins took place on 7 November 2000.[3][7] As expected, Gracie survived the operation and Rosie died. Rosie's remains were later buried on the Maltese island of Gozo.[5]

In 2014, when Gracie was 14 years old, she was living a reasonably normal life, had a younger sister, and was thinking about studying to become a physician.[7]

See also

References

  1. ^ Re A (Children) [2000] EWCA Civ 254, [2001] 2 WLR 480, [2000] 4 All ER 961 (22 September 2000), Court of Appeal (England and Wales)
  2. ^ Mcallister, J. F. O. (18 September 2000). "Kill Mary to Save Jodie?". Time. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
  3. ^ a b "Jodie and Mary: The medical facts". BBC News. 7 December 2000. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  4. ^ "Law decided fate of Mary and Jodie". The Guardian. 5 February 2002. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
  5. ^ a b c "Siamese Twins Case Presents Serious Legal Doubts". Hcourt.gov.au. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  6. ^ a b Annas, George (5 April 2001). "Conjoined Twins - The Limits of Law at the limits of Life". New England Journal of Medicine (subscription required). 344 (14): 1104–1108. doi:10.1056/NEJM200104053441419. PMID 11287982.
  7. ^ a b "Gozo's miracle twin Gracie Attard tells her story". Times of Malta. 11 October 2014. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Re_A_(conjoined_twins)&oldid=1063906883"