User talk:Oddsausageparty

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Canford School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Canford again

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Parker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Canford yet again

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James Perowne, you may be blocked from editing. Dormskirk (talk) 12:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 12:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Oddsausageparty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college.

Candyapple690 refers to the main sockpuppet account that I had used abusively. This belongs to my sibling and in line with Wikipedia policy, I first requested the review of that block. Having had it approved, I now wish to ask whether it may be possible for the ban for this account to be reviewed as it is the one I wish to use. I hope this makes sense, thank you for your time and consideration.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= <p> In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college.</P>

<p>Candyapple690 refers to the main sockpuppet account that I had used abusively. This belongs to my sibling and in line with Wikipedia policy, I first requested the review of that block. Having had it approved, I now wish to ask whether it may be possible for the ban for this account to be reviewed as it is the one I wish to use. I hope this makes sense, thank you for your time and consideration.</P> |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= <p> In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college.</P>

<p>Candyapple690 refers to the main sockpuppet account that I had used abusively. This belongs to my sibling and in line with Wikipedia policy, I first requested the review of that block. Having had it approved, I now wish to ask whether it may be possible for the ban for this account to be reviewed as it is the one I wish to use. I hope this makes sense, thank you for your time and consideration.</P> |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= <p> In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college.</P>

<p>Candyapple690 refers to the main sockpuppet account that I had used abusively. This belongs to my sibling and in line with Wikipedia policy, I first requested the review of that block. Having had it approved, I now wish to ask whether it may be possible for the ban for this account to be reviewed as it is the one I wish to use. I hope this makes sense, thank you for your time and consideration.</P> |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}