Jump to content

Talk:Isotopes of europium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DePiep (talk | contribs) at 04:38, 11 January 2022 (OneClickArchiver archived What theory? to Talk:Isotopes of europium/Archive 1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconElements: Isotopes List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Isotope Taskforce.

Low Half-life values of OO63Eu144 and OO63Eu140

The reported half-lives do not agree with the half-life trend line of the rest of the 63Eu Europium OO type isotopes.WFPM (talk) 23:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How would 153
Eu
decay to a much less stable isotope, 149
Pm
?

Because 149
Pm
is way too unstable, so shouldn't 153
Eu
be stable too? 80.98.179.160 (talk) 07:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is pretty normal: the obvious example is that 238U (half-life 4.468 × 109 years) decays to 234Th (half-life 24.1 days). The important thing is that the system of 149Pm plus an alpha particle is a lower-energy arrangement of 63 protons and 90 neutrons than a single 153Eu nucleus (just look at the binding energies), and so the decay is energetically allowed. Of course, it is kinetically hindered for other reasons. The beta-instability of 149Pm has nothing to do with it. Double sharp (talk) 07:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]