Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandar Agashe (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2405:201:1006:e03a:dc9c:8154:fae9:3d2c (talk) at 06:49, 22 January 2022 (Mandar Agashe). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Mandar Agashe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural listing per close of Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 January 2. No opinion from me. Daniel (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral for now. It does seem to have the hallmarks of paid editing. Deb (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (tentative vote). A laundry list of sources have been provided in the DRV linked by Daniel. @SmokeyJoe: checked a few of them and found them passing mentions and/or not indepedent. I've independently clicked on about 5 sources there or in the article itself and felt the same. It's possible there's wheat among the chaff or other better sources available, but someone will need to make a WP:THREE argument if that's the case. Martinp (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are also google book sources I found and added to the article that seem to be book versions of some magazines:

We also discussed these sources, but Martinp said they are significant coverage but may not be independent:

I am not well versed with all of Wikipedia's policies as a casual reader and editor, but I think the WP:THREE rule is met. 2405:201:1006:E03A:DC9C:8154:FAE9:3D2C (talk) 06:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]