Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jules Gladys
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 18:06, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jules Gladys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject is not notable as a filmmaker per WP:CREATIVE or WP:NACTOR if read to include other film-related persons than actors. The subject also fails higher standards of WP:GNG (significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources) — no factors are present. See also the edit history and this and this and finally this for good indicators that it's just WP:TOOSOON to call the subject and her works notable. JFHJr (㊟) 02:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I edited it based on the information I had when I attended a workshop in London Film School. However should this be part of wiki is a question that I ask you. - (ATLASVishnu)
- Comment — That's interesting; if you have published materials from the workshop that could be cited to, and most importantly verified, they might be used to demonstrate some sort of notability. This could be either for the current article or to support a future article when the subject is more clearly notable. JFHJr (㊟) 19:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although the person may meet notability standards in even the near future, she does not meet them yet. Write the article when she does. Collect (talk) 11:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with Collect -- ATLASVishnu
- Are you !voting delete? JFHJr (㊟) 01:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes.. thanks. ATLASVishnu —Preceding undated comment added 18:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As the person who brought this to the notice of the BLP notice board I was hoping that their research skills might find enough to justify the article but it doesn't look like that can be done at this time. Should her career progress to the point that she meets our guidelines for WP:NOTABILITY we can certainly restore the article and improve on it. MarnetteD | Talk 02:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.