Jump to content

User talk:Qwerfjkl/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 07:01, 4 February 2022 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:Qwerfjkl) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive 1Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

Question from Kiera Roche on User:Kiera Roche/sandbox (06:19, 19 December 2021)

Hi, i have created a page for the charity I run. How do I publish it to Wikipedia for other people to see?

LimbPower --Kiera Roche (talk) 06:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

@Kiera Roche: You place {{subst:submit}} at the top of your page, and then it will be reviewed (which may take up to 3 months). ― Qwerfjkltalk 09:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Empty categories

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

Thank you so much for tagging the empty categories! For years, I did this task every morning (U.S. time) but lately I've been getting to it later and later in the day and I didn't do it at all yesterday so today's list was twice as long. It's good that there is more than one person who checks this list. Typically, there are between 10-20 categories each day but it can get into the hundreds depending on what pages have been deleted so extra help is always welcome. It doesn't take a lot of time to do, but it's good to stay on top of so things don't pile up.

There are a few editors who create most of our categories who have asked not to be notified when a category they created has become empty and I can relay this information to you if you pick this up as a regular task and add it to your already crowded list of things you tend to on Wikipedia. Thanks again! Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

No problem! I intend to keep patrolling Special:UnusedCategories, so a list of editors not to notify would be great. Thanks! ― Qwerfjkltalk 12:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Pinging @Liz. (Or Wikipedia:Database reports/Empty categories.) ― Qwerfjkltalk 07:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Okay, I'll start thinking about that list. By the way, User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/unusedCategories.js is classified as an empty category so you might want to add in a colon somewhere on the page so that it isn't tagged for deletion. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Oh, and yes, Wikipedia:Database reports/Empty categories is the page I use as it is compiled nightly (at least it's night for me) while Special:UnusedCategories is only compiled every 3 days. But, Special:UnusedCategories does have empty maintenance categories which for some reason are omitted on the Database report so that is a useful feature. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I have a comment about this that I'd prefer to email you but you don't have email enabled. So..... Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
@Liz: Just enabled it (I thought I already had). ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
You got mail! Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 20:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Sadly I can't access my email on my.mobile device, so I'll read it tomorrow. ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

22:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Why NO BOTS

Hi, why did you add "NO BOTS"[3] after listing Category:Hexadecimal color redirects for renaming? It does not appear to be populated by a template. May I remove this code on WP:CFDW so that a bot will process the task? – Fayenatic London 12:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

@Fayenatic london: Okay. ― Qwerfjkltalk 12:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
@Fayenatic london: Shouldn't the category be at Category:Redirects from hexadecimal colors, not Category:Redirects from hexadecimal color ? ― Qwerfjkltalk 13:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Agreed, other categories of "Redirects from..." take a plural at the end of the name. I'll process that as remedial work. (WP:G6) – Fayenatic London 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22

Merry Christmas!

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Cheers! ― Qwerfjkltalk 08:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Winter Greetings

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Copying Signatures

Hi, I wanted to tell you something. Here you moved my question from the Teahouse, along with the signatures, which I think you are not supposed to do according to @Nick Moyes what he said here. I am quoting the part- If you find complex advice helpful, you could always think about making another sandbox page just for table advice, and either link to the diff that it was given, or copy/paste the reply into your sandbox page, and split it up into different headings. If you do the latter, strip out the persons signature - or at the very least the date/time stamp, but make an edit summary crediting them when you copy it into your sandbox. This is called 'attribution' and helps credit other peoples work. So, why did you then copy the stuff along with the signatures? Is it allowed in some cases? ― ItcouldbepossibleTalk 07:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi! It's fine to keep the signatures if you're just moving a discussion (otherwise it would be hard to understand). When you are testing something in a sandbox, you may alter something somebody said, which would give a false impression (at least I think that's the issue). ― Qwerfjkltalk 09:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying my doubt. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 11:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Ten Months

Hi, how come you made 50000 edits in only 10 months time? What is the secret? How much time do you spend at Wikipedia? ― ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

@Itcouldbepossible: I am very active in Wikipedia, and I do a lot of semi-automatic editing - see AWB. ― Qwerfjkltalk 09:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I knew about WP:AWB, but did not know, that if could help make so many edits, in so less time. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 11:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Question from Roblue (03:33, 29 December 2021)

Is there a dark mode on wikipedia? --Roblue (talk) 03:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

@Roblue: Yes, Preferences → Gadgets → Appearance → Tick Dark mode toggle: Enable a toggle for using a light text on dark background color scheme ― Qwerfjkltalk 10:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

RFA 2021 Completed

The 2021 re-examination of RFA has been completed. 23 (plus 2 variants) ideas were proposed. Over 200 editors participated in this final phase. Three changes gained consensus and two proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration. Thanks to all who helped to close the discussion, and in particular Primefac, Lee Vilenski, and Ymblanter for closing the most difficult conversations and for TonyBallioni for closing the review of one of the closes.

The following proposals gained consensus and have all been implemented:

  1. Revision of standard question 1 to Why are you interested in becoming an administrator? Special thanks to xaosflux for help with implementation.
  2. A new process, Administrative Action Review (XRV) designed to review if an editor's specific use of an advanced permission, including the admin tools, is consistent with policy in a process similar to that of deletion review and move review. Thanks to all the editors who contributed (and are continuing to contribute) to the discussion of how to implement this proposal.
  3. Removal of autopatrol from the administrator's toolkit. Special thanks to Wugapodes and Seddon for their help with implementation.

The following proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration:

  1. An option for people to run for temporary adminship (proposal, discussion, & close)
  2. An optional election process (proposal & discussion and close review & re-close)

Editors who wish to discuss these ideas or other ideas on how to try to address any of the six issues identified during phase 1 for which no proposal gained are encouraged to do so at RFA's talk page or an appropriate village pump.

A final and huge thanks all those who participated in this effort to improve our RFA process over the last 4 months.


This is the final update with no further talk page messages planned.

01:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Qwerfjkl (bot) 4 approved

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 4 has been approved. Happy editing! --TheSandDoctor Talk 17:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

It does not make any sense to mix singular and plural entries on the disambiguation page Lupae when the Lupa page already exists. It's fine to mix singular and plural on the same page, but there should only be one page with all the other disambiguation titles pointing to it. SpinningSpark 15:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Human Body Mass Index

Hey any luck or chances to create animated development of human body using your own faces with tanner scale feature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_scale ? Unmaaned (talk) 15:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year Qwerfjkl!

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

Category:International airports has been nominated for deletion

Category:International airports has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:International airports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_15#Category:International_airports. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Qwerfjkl. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 00:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)~. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

58.107.87.231 (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

Since you are tagging empty categories lately, I thought I'd let you know that there are a couple dozen categories that appear on the empty categories list that were emptied "out of process" and so I have reverted that editor's edits. So, these "People from" categories are no longer empty. I know that you would see that as soon as you opened the categories to tag them but I thought I'd let you know ahead of time that not all categories on this long list are actually empty and need to be tagged.

Thank you for your work! Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)