Talk:Minutes

Business C‑class Top‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parliamentary Procedure (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Parliamentary ProcedureWikipedia:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureTemplate:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureParliamentary Procedure

Fact dropping

It probably come from minutiae - a Latin word meaning small details - LC

Too conducive to understand

This article is too conducive to understand, please dumb it down a little so NORMAL people would get what it means.

Need advice

Can full and detailed minutes, taken and submitted by the minute taker, be paraphrased by the chairman/secretary before the committee see them and this paraphrase be the only "minutes" the committee are permitted to see? Does a Chairman/Secretary have the authority to do this? Is there a protocol handbook anywhere to help inexperienced committees understand the rules of the game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.65.207 (talk) 16:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Legal requirements

What are the legal requirements and or consequences for not taking minutes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.195.130.34 (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In what context and region? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.96.38.41 (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Respectively?

In all my years, the minutes have always ended, "Respectfully submitted,". "Respectively" wouldn't have any applicable meaning that my dictionary knows. J S Ayer (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minutes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222144435/https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-035-002.html to https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-035-002.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

faizanfarooq14322@gmail.com