Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennity Ice Skating Pavilion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:58, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:58, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep - disruptive bad faith retaliatory nomination. Smashvilletalk 19:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Tennity Ice Skating Pavilion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete. This article is in violation of Notability as there is nothing published about it.Gravityforce (talk) 00:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable for being the home rink of a major-college (Division I) intercollegiate hockey program. And gosh, thanks so much for notifying me (the author) of the nomination. Powers T 16:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And, golly, this wouldn't happen to be a bad-faith nomination intended as retaliation for my recommendation for your article on the Unified Gravity Corporation to be deleted, would it? I'm sure you wouldn't do that, would you? Powers T 16:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions. —Powers T 16:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as major arena for a NCAA D1 ice hockey team. -Djsasso (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but please get some references in there. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 16:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per djsasso. Resolute 17:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.