Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess (Flash series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Princess (Flash series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as there's no verifiable references that Trey Parker & Matt Stone had anything to do with the project which is currently the only claim of notability.

I'm unable to find any sources that can be used to verify that this content was made by Trey Parker & Matt Stone. There's a link to South Park Studios that can't be verified (dead link) that previously pointed to another website all together. There's also a link to SPSChat, a fansite which doesn't provide any reliable sources to back up its claim that Trey Parker and Matt Stone had anything to do with Princess and itself is not a reliable source. A Google News search provides two hits which have nothing to do with this show and I've gone through several pages of Google News Archive hits and haven't found a single reliable source that discusses the topic. OlYeller^Talktome 02:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Dead link has been repaired and confirms their involvement (rather easily as they just changed the page structure), and a confirmed project by the both of them that didn't go anywhere, which is expected as it was one of those killed by the dot-com bust and many of the links describing it were probably fellow dot-com victims. Nate • (chatter) 04:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Nate. Ryan shell (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note I think it's safe to close this nomination at this point. I withdraw, conceded, etc. as verifiable proof has been given. OlYeller^Talktome 14:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Pretty minor part of Matt Stone and Trey Parker's career, but no good place to merge it to. Maybe we should put it in Matt Stone and Trey Parker's shorts. Sharksaredangerous (talk) 22:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.