Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mickolus

Edward Mickolus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Edward Mickolus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication in the article or in searches that this article passes WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. All references are lacking in either significance, independence, or reliability. Also violates WP:NOTRESUME. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Comment: This looks like a good faith 2011 contribution by now blocked User:Geo Swan. This diff shows the insertion of all the resume info in 2018 by the subject themself. No opinion about the outcome here. BusterD (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

• Weak keep So I came across this article in the references section of Hassan Al-Turabi's article. I think it helps show that it's a good source for the article, but other than that, I can't think of any other reason why he'd count as notable. However, I posted on the talk page and noticeboard specifically without mentioning article deletion since I disagree with Wikipedia's notability guidelines in general, but if it violates them, then there's not much else to do other than removal. Seabass715 (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Seabass715.
• Weak keep? There may be a weak pass of WP:AUTHOR, but the BLP contains a vast amount of dross that should be deleted. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC).
• Keep Marquis Who's Who doesn't count though and other sources briefly discuss him. But I found some book reviews so inclined towards keep. Coverage: [1], [2], [3]. 67.168.136.107 (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)