Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMX (Procol Harum album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:40, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Procol Harum discography#Live albums. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 03:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MMX (Procol Harum album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable enough to warrant its own article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Pishcal 13:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Procol Harum discography#Live albums or delete. I don't see any evidence that it has received coverage in reliable sources. I guess not everything a famous band releases becomes notable. So, best thing to do right now is probably redirect to the discography. If reliable sources surface, then the article can be restored. It's unlikely anyone will ever do a search for this title, but this title might get linked from other articles. As a courtesy to readers, it might be good to give them somewhere to find minimal amounts of information, such as release date and charting information. But deletion is alright, too, if consensus is that the redirect isn't useful. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.