Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansoor Malangi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:54, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. appears to be an unsourced BLP and no sources have been provided Spartaz Humbug! 07:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mansoor Malangi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been tagged for notability since 2008 and the ref does not even go to him it seems! Wgolf (talk) 00:17, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 01:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - From what I can see via video footage on the web, he appeared on what appears Pakistani television a number of times. [1]. Indeed one video collects nearly four hours of television footage [2], which certainly implies that he was of note. Without being from Pakistan and having a better understanding of their culture and notable sources to say otherwise, I'd say that he looks to have been notable. That said, the article barely warrants being called that. It would be nice if someone could provide more detailed information.Ceronomus (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.