Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold H. Buls

Harold H. Buls

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Low to no citations on his academic work, and no independent coverage found. I'm sure he was a fine professor, but he's just not notable. schetm (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like he and his notes on various Bible verses are reasonably well-known among Lutheran ministers, but until one of them writes a biography on him or collects those notes into an edited volume, it doesn't look like there are any sources for us to use to say that. -- asilvering (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He would have to pass through WP:GNC as he fails all WP:NACADEMIC criteria considerably. That being said he does not pass WP:GNC with the article in its current form.