Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Aarrestad Uldalen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:06, 14 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:06, 14 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. LFaraone 04:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Henrik Aarrestad Uldalen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe this person fails WP:ARTIST. Written like an advert with a selfpublished link. Maybe re-create article when he is more established? Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 19:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 19:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of attained WP:ARTIST notability. The article describes the subject as "young and aspiring ... beginning to make a name for himself"; at best an article is WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 13:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems notable per [1], [2], and apparently an additional profile in the print edition of Hi-Fructose - see [3]. --Cerebellum (talk) 23:37, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.