Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funga
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) at 21:57, 14 February 2022 (Fix misnested tag lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:57, 14 February 2022 by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) (Fix misnested tag lint errors)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 00:41, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP is not for things made up in school one day ~ Booyabazooka 03:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As a neologism. Bobby1011 03:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per bobby. --lightdarkness (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. WP:NFT (this page explains the "things made up in school one day" guideline, not WP:NOT). Royal Blue T/C 03:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism. The first line did it in. Wkipedia is definitely not for something made up in school one day.--Dakota ~ ° 03:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable, WP:NFT-violating neologism. Essentially nothing more than an Urban Dicdef. --Kinu t/c 04:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn neologism. --Terence Ong 15:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nominated. -- Krash (Talk) 23:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.