Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grabs, Snatches & Takes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grabs, Snatches & Takes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for this album. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 22:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—One could reasonably expect that an album, even one of unreleased material, by an artist this notable, would itself be notable. But you'd be wrong. There's no coverage of it anywhere, even in paid research databases. Even normally chatty allmusic only has a track listing. No notability! Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 01:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not seem to meet any part of WP:GNG, in addition to the above statements.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.