Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 16

< May 15	May 17 >

May 16

Oqee0fll.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oqee0fll.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SSJ 5 (notify | contribs).

Non-free image used to show what can be adequately explained with (free) text. We don't need an image to understand that Yamcha and Tien appeared in combination Jay32183 (talk) 01:56, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Trasmundo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trasmundo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Justin Foote (notify | contribs).

Gratuitous use of nonfree media: appears only in gallery and not discussed directly in article text. Article contains 5 nonfree images. Beautiful artwork, but excessive. Durova^Charge! 04:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Reflejo Lunar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reflejo Lunar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Justin Foote (notify | contribs).

Gratuitous use of nonfree media: appears only in gallery and not discussed directly in article text. Article contains 5 nonfree images. Beautiful artwork, but excessive. Durova^Charge! 04:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Still Life Reviving.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Still Life Reviving.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Justin Foote (notify | contribs).

Gratuitous use of nonfree media: appears only in gallery and not discussed directly in article text. Article contains 5 nonfree images. Beautiful artwork, but excessive. Durova^Charge! 04:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Men_with_micropenis.jpg‎

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image can be very offensive to holders of this syndrome and is unnecessary.Mellowsal (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fuck.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fuck.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skier Dude (notify | contribs).

Shadows an image from Commons. We could easily protect this page against creation if it is a concern. -- Luk ^talk 10:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete the image and salt the page if need be but as it is now, it's preventing an image by the same name at Commons from being used. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 17:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Allstarecho. American Eagle (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Useless image, except if renamed. Salt as a strong vandalism target. The Commons image isn't very good either. Royal broil 03:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SHeDAISY Passenger Seat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SHeDAISY Passenger Seat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sltchocum (notify | contribs).

Very low quality, no source. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 19:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Matthew pawlowski.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matthew pawlowski.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Azruski (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, used only in a possible hoaxed article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 20:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dunakorzo-PestFromGellertHill 50mm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dunakorzo-PestFromGellertHill 50mm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tamas Szabo (notify | contribs).

Looking at the page history, it appears that the uploader may not have understood the real meaning of the GFDL tag... it looks like the text was copied from somewhere and the tag was created because of that. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Classic example of a user randomly adding any text he thinks will stop his image getting deleted. Stifle (talk) 08:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ceiling Cat good vs evil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling Cat good vs evil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bigflavor (notify | contribs).

Copyright violation. The uploader claims it's free (the first time he uploaded it he tagged it as CC-BY-3.0, the second time as PD), but as far as I know this and most other well-known lolcat images sitting around online are copyrighted. I deleted this once, and the uploader re-uploaded it, so I'm listing it here. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 21:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'If' it was posted on 4chan then its good to use... but seeing as content on 4chan lasts no more than 20 mins....--Nialljames (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that it's modified from this common image, which I'm fairly certain is not free. The uploader photoshopped "ceiling cat" into this other image, meaning that it's a non-free derivative work. He might be able to post it on 4chan, but that doesn't mean he should be able to post it on Wikipedia. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 21:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would go as far as assuming that anything posted on 4chan is a copyvio ;[ Delete unless PD status is properly established (and a source, for that matter). Stifle (talk) 08:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.