User talk:SriSriChinmaya

January 2022

In the past two years, I have contributed to a good amount of articles. My interest areas are art and culture. If to further define in that then it would be the field of Abstract Art. What I have found in my understanding, I try to update several Wikipedia pages. Especially the ones that deal with Artists and Art Techniques. I believe every artist worth his or her salt should get a decent space on Wikipedia. I have no conflict of interest when it comes to writing articles or suggesting changes on Wikipedia. I genuinely think that the world of art needs support from the world of writing. Critically looking at a piece of art, examining it and putting out its virtues in the world is no less than creating an artwork. The more people understand art, art style and artists; the more it will be easier for them to understand the hidden meaning the intriguing art world throws at them.

My Contribution (indicative): 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wassily_Kandinsky 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilma_af_Klint 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style_(visual_arts)

SriSriChinmaya (talk) 10:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Abstract art, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 11:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signature style moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Signature style, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Signature Style (Abstract Art)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Signature Style (Abstract Art). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Style (visual arts). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Style (visual arts). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 10:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== Signature style About the 'Signature Style' in Abstract Art

Hi Fram,

Thanks for reaching out. I understand your concerns. Signature Style in Abstract Art, or for that matter in any field of art, is a legitimate thing. But I think your concerns are valid. Let me rework on it and come back with a better article. Till then, I will be working in draftspace and try to augment the article with better citations and references.

Chinmay (talk) 04:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)SriSriChinmaya[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shorya Mahanot (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Deb were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please ensure that you declare any conflict of interest on your user page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shorya Mahanot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shorya Mahanot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 16:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SriSriChinmaya! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Deb (talk) 16:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shorya Mahanot has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shorya Mahanot. Thanks! Deb (talk) 11:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hi SriSriChinmaya! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Elizabeth II that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DrKay. I will keep it in mind for future edits. Even this edit was done with good intention to improve the article. I will be careful while commenting and marking my edits. Thanks again.

SriSriChinmaya (talk)

Moderators

There are no moderators here, only other volunteer editors. Britmax (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I liked the way you stated it like a plain fact. A true Wikipedian. I will take care of that in my future notes. SriSriChinmaya (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi SriSriChinmaya! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:07, Thursday, February 17, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
133	Geometric abstraction (talk)	Add sources
114	Complexity Gaming (talk)	Add sources
39	Columbia University School of Professional Studies (talk)	Add sources
898	Color theory (talk)	Add sources
184	Gabriele Münter (talk)	Add sources
733	Short film (talk)	Add sources
8	Joop Sanders (talk)	Cleanup
28	Williamsburg Houses (talk)	Cleanup
1,265	Mickey Deans (talk)	Cleanup
5	Index of Antigua and Barbuda–related articles (talk)	Expand
2,100	Translation (talk)	Expand
3,221	Graphic design (talk)	Expand
88	History of Antigua and Barbuda (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
15	Eugenio Granell (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
44	Vere Bird (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
26	Great Goddess hypothesis (talk)	Merge
8	St. Joseph Church (talk)	Merge
52	CHSH game (talk)	Merge
14	Saint Mary Parish, Antigua and Barbuda (talk)	Wikify
12	Fractal expressionism (talk)	Wikify
4	Rick Cusick (talk)	Wikify
5	Nordik (talk)	Orphan
6	Troços (talk)	Orphan
29	Shatter belt (geopolitics) (talk)	Orphan
262	Dinesh Vijan (talk)	Stub
54	Composition VII (talk)	Stub
2	I'll Get You for This (novel) (talk)	Stub
12	Oru Sandesam Koodi (talk)	Stub
13	Shadow of a Doubt (1991 film) (talk)	Stub
4	Très Court International Film Festival (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi SriSriChinmaya! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 05:10, Monday, February 28, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge