Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 20:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Constant vandalism and contradictory changes by 'IPs' to date of birth in light of death announced today. Bylandandsea (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Reason: IP's are being disruptive by adding NY Post as a source which is not considered to be reliable per policy regarding sources. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unsourced stadium and match start time additions despite hidden notices requesting sources. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Reason: A high level of vandalism and irrelevant sources has been used frequently throughout the page. Thecybergulf (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Existing user account that has been created for experimental purposes. So, genuine SPI reports cannot happen. It has been used for an example at {{sock vote}}. This page should be never be created, though it's visibility in a documentation may prompt someone to create it anyway. Creation of this page by anyone will break the example. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 13:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, mostly by IPs. Jacona (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from unregistered IP users. This has continued for several years now, usually involving replacing Content with a single word or phrase. PerryPerryD (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- I forgot to include the protection level that is being requested. Semi-Protection. PerryPerryD (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper pushing junk source, working on consensus to talk to WP:SPB for long-term fix. Ravensfire (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There is an IP user that has made dozens of edits on this page; they don't seem to be constructive (one of them was reverted by me, the user has reverted their own edits multiple times in what looks like an attempt to get their edit count up) by any means. I am hoping that semi-protection for a temporary period (a few days or 1-2 weeks) will discourage whatever is happening to this page. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Wretchskull (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A big budget film based on subject's file was released a couple of days ago, leading to disruptive/POV/unsourced edits to the article. Requesting semi protection for two weeks. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 17:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Jaydowg1914 (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)