Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Ash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Michig (talk | contribs) at 12:24, 4 March 2022 (Closing discussion, result was Delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Ash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by article creator - who, I note, has had a number of their footballer bios deleted or draftified. This player fails WP:GNG (no significant coverage) and WP:NFOOTBALL (never played in a fully-professional league, never in the Football League - only in non-league National League which does not confer notability). Unlikely to be notable any time soon so draftifying not appropriate. GiantSnowman 12:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Yes Yes No Soccerway stats page No
No He played for Barnsley FC, not independent No No Generic and brief transfer news No
Yes Yes ~ Most of the coverage is just a long quote from him and his manager rather than independent analysis ~ Partial
Yes Yes No Just brief stats and two quotes No
Yes Yes No Not addressed in detail No
No Weymouth's own site No No No
Yes Yes ~ Contains a little bit more than just basic stats but not enough to justify an entire article on Ash ~ Partial
Yes Yes No Contains almost nothing No
Yes Yes No Basic stats No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.