User talk:Btspurplegalaxy

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is Btspurplegalaxy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 21 days

.

Don't you click "show preview" before applying changes to the article? It obviously says there is a maintenance message for one of the references and I solved it and you reverted it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyoren1 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there were any errors with the references, then it would be in red with an error message, indicating that it needs to be fixed. None of the references show that. It must be a problem on your side. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 17:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Song ha yoon

Why you changed my edit on her? 180.252.166.205 (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lee Ga-eun

Hello, Btspurplegalaxy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lee Ga-eun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For helping me out with the user who is not wanting to discuss their image changes to Ong Seong-wu. I had even started a discussion to try and get them to discuss their reasoning, however they decided to ignore it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 03:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks! Totally agreed that it make zero sense, if so then enlighten me on why it make sense for (G)I-dle then??? Fyi, I'm pretty sure you edited it between September 14, 2021 and today (February 26, 2022) which is 200 days differences, in which you also uploaded a tweaked version of the cropped image by brightening up or something (this), hence I'm looking to heard your opinion on such while at the same time also other editors opinion so that I know what appropriate actions to take such as to revert or not to revert. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't much know of what anyone else is doing but I just know it should be consistent for all group articles for those who have former members. I restored an older revision to have it set back to the 5 members. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 17:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Btspurplegalaxy Ya, same thoughts, I'm reverted it back initially because I also feel there should be consistency for all articles (at least for K-pop ones since I'm only focused on that) but clearly other (maybe 1) feel otherwise which make me questioned myself if this is even right. Anyway ... thanks you for your opinion. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion

Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to BTS singles discography.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref> and one or more <ref name="foo"/> referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref> but left the <ref name="foo"/>, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/> with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}} to your talk page.[reply]

Mononymously

This ridiculous word has very recently been sprinkled across multiple acticles on Wikipedia. The idea of Wikipedia is that articles should be written in a language people understand, and not in passing buzz-words. Articles should be accessible to all readers and not just readers of fanzines. Francis Hannaway (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with it being used. You don't need to go around removing the word just because it's not something you like. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 07:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JK's Artistry

Hi there! Do you have (or know of someone who has) information on JK's Artistry? I noticed that all of his bandmates have that in their pages. Thank you! 130.105.208.241 (talk) 06:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]