Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marty Clapton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marty Clapton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Mid-minors player without distinction, fails NHOCKEY. Another of the hundreds of NN hockey bio articles thrown up by the creator in defiance of the NHOCKEY criteria, and for which he's been under sanction regarding new article creation for many months, all in search of some mythical article creation Game High Score. The subject is discussed at length in the book cited in the article, but that's the only source which meets the GNG that's out there, and the GNG requires that the subject be discussed in "significant detail" in multiple reliable sources. Ravenswing 18:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 18:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Career minor leaguer, I could find no evidence that he can pass WP:GNG. Deadman137 (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this suggests independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.