Talk:National Unity Government of Myanmar

Myanmar B‑class High‑importance

National Unity Government of Myanmar is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar

B

This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Neutrality

As written, the article makes it sound as if the NUG is actually governing in Myanmar, and makes no mention of the fact that it's a government in exile and the State Administration Council is the government actually in power. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 04:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tartan357:;

They are both trying to claim the title "Legitimate Government of Myanmar" and trying to rule the country and both still don't have the power to rule the country. NUG as the federal democratic way and caretaker government as the dictatorist way. You might think Military's government is in power because they have offices but it's absolutly not, as you could see in the days of Silence Strikes, people only followed NUG's statement and didn't follow (nearly) anything that has been announced by Military's Government.

Editor in Myanmar (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Can we perhaps add the criticism section on this page, with particular regards to NUG not being representative of various stakeholders of Myanmar (for example some Rakhine and Rohingya^[1])? The nature of NUG and the circumstances of its origin definitely plays a role in limited representation, which bounds its ability to consider different voices and concerns from those who are not at the table. Xanekka (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xanekka, in most cases I think criticism is best integrated with other content rather than in a standalone criticism section—see WP:CRIT. I'd suggest creating a section on the stakeholders in general which can include some of this criticism alongside less controversial information. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmars-parallel-govts-rohingya-policy-angers-rakhine-groups.html

[1] ttps://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmars-parallel-govts-rohingya-policy-angers-rakhine-groups.html

[1]