Talk:Eidetic memory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eidetic memory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Education C‑class Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Psychology C‑class Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skepticism C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

/archive 1

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 February 2020 and 2 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NoemieB2000.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Akhter Ahsen" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Akhter Ahsen. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Akhter Ahsen until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How about revealing that εἶδος means "to see" and not just mentioning that it is a Greek word?

--Felix Tritschler (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Memory material in general

I reverted Jamesmcardle on this and this because they are different topics. This article is not about memory material in general. See WP:Synthesis. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this? Do not WP:Edit war. What is not clear about our WP:Synthesis policy? The sources must be specifically about eidetic memory. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the Visual memory article. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly there is a case for merging Visual Memory with Eidetic memory... The article does not make a distinction, with proper, reliable citations, between 'photographic memory' and 'eidetic memory'.Jamesmcardle^(talk) 07:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Flyer22 Frozen: You could start with a dictionary definition of 'eidetic' e.g. "relating to or denoting mental images having unusual vividness and detail, as if actually visible," which is precisely the subject of the research, and findings from that research, and method in the practice of art, I have introduced into the article. I don't see your point.Jamesmcardle^(talk) 07:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I stand by what I stated above. You don't get my point because you, for whatever reason, don't understand our WP:Synthesis policy. And, no, there is not a good case for merging the Visual memory article (a broader topic) with the Eidetic memory article. And as for "the article does not make a distinction, with proper, reliable citations, between 'photographic memory' and 'eidetic memory'"? It does. It uses academic sources per WP:Scholarship. But it is also clear that eidetic memory and photographic memory are popularly used interchangeably. Where are the sources stating that visual memory and eidetic memory are popularly used interchangeably?

I await other opinions on this matter. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No need to ping me to this page since I am obviously watching this article. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With all due courtesy, as am I. Including this article in WP Skepticism indicates the bias not mentioned in https://www.britannica.com/science/eidetic-imagery (though I don't have full access), and with all due respects Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy quotes only old research. Having had my additions summarlly overruled, I'll step back politely and wait to see what others have to say. Jamesmcardle^(talk) 08:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only old research? There is not a lot of research on this specific topic. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 08:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That material does appear to be WP:Synthesis in this article, so it doesn't belong. I definitely don't see a case for merging with Visual memory. This is not the same thing. Crossroads ^-talk- 02:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Specifics Of Photographic Memory vs Popular Myth

Th78blue Hello. Replying to you in the article talk as opposed to individual page talk. Neither of your sources calls photographic memory "popular myth" and, indeed, the sources specify that forms of limited, event/visual-specific photographic memory exist. My edit reflects what is in the source material without discrediting the entire idea of some limited photographic memory. It also dispels the notion of "popular myth." Let me know if I am missing something by trying to clarify the sentence. Thanks.50.225.201.71 (talk) 07:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like the phrase "absolute recall of all events in a lifetime" overly narrows the scope of that definition and the previous text was better. There doesn't seem to be any compelling evidence that photographic memory lasting more than a few seconds or minutes exists -- let alone perfect recall of all events in one's entire life. Destynova (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

suggestions

I would like for there to be an option to narrate the article. 2600:1012:B12E:9902:482E:D29E:EB6E:8C61 (talk) 04:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]