User talk:Renzoy16/Archivebox 1

Percentage in Live Shows

Terrence, the percentage shows how strong is the Artist compared to the ones who are in Bottom two. If this is not important, the host of the show will not mention it on the Live Show. So, please -- leave it. Ok? --polmags (talk)

Hi! Thanks sa updates sa PBB ALL IN :))

PBB ALL IN

Ok let me clear it out for you, last night the housemates were labeled as Housemate A, Housemate B, Housemate C, Housemate D and Housemate E with Loisa going home with 0.99% as she was also revealed as Housemate D. However, after the episode official twitter of ABS-CBN revealed that

Housemate A, Housemate B, Housemate C, Housemate D and Housemate E were Jane, Daniel, Maris, Loisa and Vickie respectively. It was also shown in the beginning of the Big Night episode.

But then you put Housemate B with the highest vote which is so incorrect as it was Housemate A who got the highest net vote at that time that's why i'm changing it, same with the S-E voting result.

Clearly you're the one who's putting wrong information here not me. Go ahead and report me, I have my evidences to prove it.

PBB All In

https://twitter.com/abscbndotcom/status/503225991884320768 https://twitter.com/PBBabscbn/status/503221507468693506

Here you go. The proper placements of the Housemates last eviction night as posted by the official team of ABS-CBN and the show handler herself.

Orphaned non-free image File:Crowdtilt logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crowdtilt logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Paid Editing/Nofel Izz

Hi. As it was fairly recent, you may not be aware that Wikipedia's Terms of Use were changed on June 15. As a result, it is now necessary under the new rules that anyone being paid to edit on behalf of a client must disclose that relationship. You have a few options as to how - you can make a declaration in the edit summaries, add a statement to the talk page of the article, or you can add a statement to your user page. The disclosure needs to include your employer, your client, and the manner in which you are affiliated, although the "employer" is clearly not relevant when you are doing freelance work. This won't prevent you from doing paid editing work, but is intended to meet the requirements for transparency within the project. For more information, the Terms of Use will help, as will the accompaning FAQ. As far as I'm aware, you haven't made a declaration along those lines in regard to Nofel Izz, so if you plan to continue to edit on his behalf you will need to clarify your relationship with the subject. - Bilby (talk) 03:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bb. Pilipinas logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bb. Pilipinas logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:I Do Village.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:I Do Village.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

PBB

PBB

Hello, I think you're the one who's putting wrong info's in the page, for example, Jane who got the highest vote last time is "Housemate A and not Housemate B as you post in the page, plus it shouldn't be hidden anymore who got the votes last night cause it was shown at the beginning of the finale. Sorry to say but you're the one who's putting wrong information. Jayven09maddie (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homeostatic capacity, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stress and Stimuli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The Battles PH season two stage.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Battles PH season two stage.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pope Francis' visit to the Philippines

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bookboon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bookboon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —George8211 / T 11:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

hi can you send me some actual spelling errored articles?

hi can you send me some actual spelling errored articles? bye Superkid761 (talk) 09:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice Kids (Philippines season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Davao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Something

Look Renzoy16 I'm Sorry for attacking you you are the great editor in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vince daryl falcunitin (talk • contribs) 02:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your Face Sounds Familiar (Philippines season 1)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Your Face Sounds Familiar (Philippines season 1), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://pinoy247tambayan.blogspot.com/2015/04/your-face-sounds-familiar-april-18-2015.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 00:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ServerCentral official logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ServerCentral official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DolarToday logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DolarToday logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

autopatrolled user right

Hi Renzoy16, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Katie^talk 20:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Another COIN discussion

Editors are assuming that you were paid to edit once again. Since you didn't respond to the last COIN discussion, it's hard to argue otherwise: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Conley_family. --Ronz (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Conley family

Category:Conley family, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Nimbo (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nimbo (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimbo (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 15:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

wadi hanifa

dear/maam pleas inform my wife merlinda tiwanac too call me or access any contact for me/if ever she didnot cooperiat/in these comin monday i will fill departatio in p.o.e.a or owwa,in what reason blocking me. pleas rply.morshtiwanac@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.210.121.250 (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Stocktrek Images.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Stocktrek Images.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Virtual Staff Finder logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Virtual Staff Finder logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:21, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohammed bin Rashid Space Centre

The article Mohammed bin Rashid Space Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:94.205.243.210

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Terra^★ 07:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaun Bonétt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Ignatius College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Disclosing on the articles you worked on

Hi Renzoy16 - thanks very much for being open about your paid editing on your User page. Would you please go back over the articles you wrote for pay, and place and complete the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template at the top of each Talk page. I was going to do it, but you really should, since you are the one making money. It would be good if you put this on the Talk page when you were creating the article, at the same time you list it on your Talk page. Please let me know if you will take care of this going backwards, as well as forwards. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 03:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Removal of landfall of Typhoon Nona

I noticed the removal of these event from 2015 in the Philippines, the landfall of Typhoon Nona (Melor), which is major. Is that minor or removed it by mistake?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Voice Indonesia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Voice Indonesia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Two threads are now open on your editing. - Brianhe (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Shaun Bonétt

Hi Renzoy16. The subject article, and related articles, have an extensive history of paid editing. You have disclosed paid editing on other articles, per your Userpage. For some reason you have gotten involved at the subject article; you have said that you are not getting paid to work on it.

here are your contributions to that article. your first edit introduced a bunch of promotional content, and quotes that are too long for fair use that contain yet more promotion, and took away the tags. This is a classic paid editing job. And on the talk page, you have pushed to get rid of the tags. Again, this is often the assignment, in paid editing work.

You have been a good citizen to a certain extent, and I appreciate that. But your activity on this article contradicts your assertion. Would you please reconsider your disclosure on this article?

If you are indeed not getting paid, I would strongly advise you to walk away from this article, as what you are doing there in the context of a statement that you are not getting paid, is seriously harming your reputation.

Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello User:Jytdog, please look at the article before I edited it. How can you say that I introduced promotional content when I rewrote what a series of suspected paid advocates added to that article, removing much of what could be deemed promotional? The quotes were only used within the references to ensure that the sentences in the article were verifiable and the words of the author, not those of suspected paid advocates who previously edited the article. Using authors' words from the references, rather than my own, can hardly be seen as promotional. As for the tag, you were the one who told me that paid advocates should be using {{connected contributor (paid)}} so I even added it on the talk page for the previous editors that duffbeerforme suspected were paid. What I did was I just simply removed the {{COI}} tag from the main article and added the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template to the talk page. I think both of these tags serve the same purpose and there is no need for both. If you can look at my revision, I actually left the {{advert}} tag on the article and thought it would be best to keep it there until Wiae would be done working on it.

AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

That talks around the issue, Renzoy. Wikipedia is vast; it is hard to understand why you are working on this specific article and focused on the exact same things as the paid editors who worked on this before you, were focused on. The quotes you added were blatantly promotional. This is not a subtle thing. Look, I am giving you a chance to change your disclosure, and if you will not do that, the suggestion to just walk away. You will do as you will do. And so will I. Jytdog (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The issue is not a critical one, but I was pursuing it to highlight that tags should not be an editor’s only purpose and that we need to do more. The tag can stay, but the article should be "cleaned."AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 14:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

You continue to dodge the question. Why are you working on this article? Jytdog (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Terms of use

Hi Renzoy16. About a month ago, I left you a note asking you to disclose on the article Talk pages of articles that you have already edited for pay. I see you didn't respond to that.

More importantly, the terms of use require not just that you disclose that you have edited for pay, but that you disclose your "employer, client, and affiliation" for each edit you make for pay. You have not disclosed that anywhere, and you are currently in violation of the Terms of Use. I suggest that you take care of that before you continue editing. There are admins who will block for this kind of consistent violation of the Terms of Use.

Paid editors have a place in the community, but you need to follow the Terms of Use, as well as the policies and guidelines. Please do get into compliance. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello User:Jytdog. Oh. Sorry, I forgot that one out. I tried adding one of that template in one of the articles I have created but I have stopped after due to some errands. I forgot to finish that after my errands. Regarding mostly of my old clients, I don't know who they were since they were only given to me by someone whom I also didnt knew. It's like a job that had been contracted out. I'll try to recover my online freelance job account and see if I can trace some of the other employers. Thanks.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The amendment to the terms of use requiring disclosure came into effect on June 16, 2014. For paid edits you made after that, disclosure is mandatory, and "I don't know" is not an option. Jytdog (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

You have not updated your disclosures yet. Jytdog (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your editing on the following articles also appears to be paid editing jobs that were not disclosed:

• Station (2014 film)
• Astana Economic Forum
• Michael J. Freeman
• Jack Gentry (entrepreneur)
• Tour of the Moon
• Meenakshi Dixit

You cannot do this halfway. You need to disclose completely and carefully if you are going to maintain the trust of the community. Jytdog (talk) 20:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Terms of use

Hi Renzoy16. About a month ago, I left you a note asking you to disclose on the article Talk pages of articles that you have already edited for pay. I see you didn't respond to that.

More importantly, the terms of use require not just that you disclose that you have edited for pay, but that you disclose your "employer, client, and affiliation" for each edit you make for pay. You have not disclosed that anywhere, and you are currently in violation of the Terms of Use. I suggest that you take care of that before you continue editing. There are admins who will block for this kind of consistent violation of the Terms of Use.

Paid editors have a place in the community, but you need to follow the Terms of Use, as well as the policies and guidelines. Please do get into compliance. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello User:Jytdog. Oh. Sorry, I forgot that one out. I tried adding one of that template in one of the articles I have created but I have stopped after due to some errands. I forgot to finish that after my errands. Regarding mostly of my old clients, I don't know who they were since they were only given to me by someone whom I also didnt knew. It's like a job that had been contracted out. I'll try to recover my online freelance job account and see if I can trace some of the other employers. Thanks.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The amendment to the terms of use requiring disclosure came into effect on June 16, 2014. For paid edits you made after that, disclosure is mandatory, and "I don't know" is not an option. Jytdog (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

You have not updated your disclosures yet. Jytdog (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your editing on the following articles also appears to be paid editing jobs that were not disclosed:

• Station (2014 film)
• Astana Economic Forum
• Michael J. Freeman
• Jack Gentry (entrepreneur)
• Tour of the Moon
• Meenakshi Dixit

You cannot do this halfway. You need to disclose completely and carefully if you are going to maintain the trust of the community. Jytdog (talk) 20:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Four were paid; might have missed them all out. The first two were not, all edited/created in good faith. --AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 15:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

• thank you for updating the disclosures on your userpage. Jytdog (talk) 19:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Shaun Bonétt

Hi Renzoy16. The subject article, and related articles, have an extensive history of paid editing. You have disclosed paid editing on other articles, per your Userpage. For some reason you have gotten involved at the subject article; you have said that you are not getting paid to work on it.

here are your contributions to that article. your first edit introduced a bunch of promotional content, and quotes that are too long for fair use that contain yet more promotion, and took away the tags. This is a classic paid editing job. And on the talk page, you have pushed to get rid of the tags. Again, this is often the assignment, in paid editing work.

You have been a good citizen to a certain extent, and I appreciate that. But your activity on this article contradicts your assertion. Would you please reconsider your disclosure on this article?

If you are indeed not getting paid, I would strongly advise you to walk away from this article, as what you are doing there in the context of a statement that you are not getting paid, is seriously harming your reputation.

Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello User:Jytdog, please look at the article before I edited it. How can you say that I introduced promotional content when I rewrote what a series of suspected paid advocates added to that article, removing much of what could be deemed promotional? The quotes were only used within the references to ensure that the sentences in the article were verifiable and the words of the author, not those of suspected paid advocates who previously edited the article. Using authors' words from the references, rather than my own, can hardly be seen as promotional. As for the tag, you were the one who told me that paid advocates should be using {{connected contributor (paid)}} so I even added it on the talk page for the previous editors that duffbeerforme suspected were paid. What I did was I just simply removed the {{COI}} tag from the main article and added the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template to the talk page. I think both of these tags serve the same purpose and there is no need for both. If you can look at my revision, I actually left the {{advert}} tag on the article and thought it would be best to keep it there until Wiae would be done working on it.

AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

That talks around the issue, Renzoy. Wikipedia is vast; it is hard to understand why you are working on this specific article and focused on the exact same things as the paid editors who worked on this before you, were focused on. The quotes you added were blatantly promotional. This is not a subtle thing. Look, I am giving you a chance to change your disclosure, and if you will not do that, the suggestion to just walk away. You will do as you will do. And so will I. Jytdog (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

The issue is not a critical one, but I was pursuing it to highlight that tags should not be an editor’s only purpose and that we need to do more. The tag can stay, but the article should be "cleaned."AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 14:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

You continue to dodge the question. Why are you working on this article? Jytdog (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I was interested in Shaun Bonétt's speech he gave on Infrastructure at the Commonwealth Heads of Governments Meeting last year and its relevance to the Philippines, and I thought I would update his Wikipedia profile. What brings you do the article? AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 14:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

I work on conflict of issues in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing about health and medicine. This article has been under constant pressure from editors here to promote Precision and Bonett. And as I noted, your editing is 100% aligned with the efforts of those editors, down to the emphasis on removing the tags first and foremost. Jytdog (talk) 19:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

about this - If you continue disrupting this article by making completely false claims I will bring you to ANI and seek to have you topic banned. You are walking on a razor's edge here as it is. Again I recommend you walk away from this article -- it is very hard to believe you are not being paid for your work on it, due to the similarity between your editing and the editing of known SOCKS who were clearly working for Precision, and your own history of paid editing - even down to this incorrect argument about where tags go, which JonBD also made. If you insist on continuing, you need to be extremely careful not to misrepresent anything nor violate any policies or guidelines. You risk losing editing privileges, and that is not something you will recover from easily. Jytdog (talk) 19:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal pangasinan dagupan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal pangasinan dagupan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Valencia City Bukidnon Mayors

Template:Valencia City Bukidnon Mayors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob^Talk 22:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 in Philippines law and politics

The CSD criterion for content forks doesn't apply to splits of large articles, and the aim of this article seems to be similar to others on sport etc. The two articles could be better coordinated, but it is new. If you still believe it should be deleted, please make the case at AfD. Fences&Windows 00:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nick Uhas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISTE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Voice Kids season 2 - Blind auditions screenshot.jpg.png

Thank you for uploading File:The Voice Kids season 2 - Blind auditions screenshot.jpg.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

The above concerns also apply to File:The Voice Kids PH season 3 - Blind auditions screenshot.png, File:The Voice Kids season 2 - The Battles screenshot.png, File:The Voice of the Philippines - Live shows 2.jpg, File:The Battles PH season two stage.jpg, File:The Voice of the Philippines season 2 - Blind auditions set.jpg, File:The Voice Kids season 1 - The Battles screenshot.jpg, File:The Voice Kids season 1 - Semifinals screenshot.png, File:The Voice Kids season 1 - Blind auditions screenshot.jpg, File:The Voice Kids chairs and coaches.jpg and File:The Voice Kids Philippines logo.png. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Storage Made Easy

The article Storage Made Easy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

very small company, which got a lot of the usual press notices than an internet company always gets, and they all count as press releases or mere notices, wherever published.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 15:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tabbedout

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tabbedout, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 02:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of StreetCred.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of StreetCred.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tabbedout official logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tabbedout official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tabbedout screenshot on Android.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tabbedout screenshot on Android.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DealDash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DealDash, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Light2021 (talk) 17:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of DealDash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DealDash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DealDash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 17:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Renzoy16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Nextiva

I have moved this to draft space. Considering that this article has been deleted multiple times, it is disruptive to constantly create it again and again. Please submit it through AFC. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

I think that move was made preemptively as you are not even an administrator. The current version of the article is buttressed with multiple sources that establish clear notability. The article should be moved to Nextiva and it should be discussed on the talk page--whether it should be kept or not. If you have any COI issues Lemongril1942, you should disclose those now. Thanks, Jobas (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks User:Jobas. My edit summary made it clear that this article is very unlike any older versions as it now contains twenty-six footnotes. I'd also like to find out why User:Lemongirl1942 is so invested in the articles relating to Tomas Gorny and Nextiva as well (as seen from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Gorny (3rd nomination). Would User:Kagundu like to move the article back to mainspace? How about at Nextiva? Thanks! --AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 02:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Renzoy16, if you have been paid to create this article/have a COI it is helpful if you disclose (and considering that this article has been deleted multiple times, it needs to go through AFC). I am seeing a pattern of promotion here btw, repeatedly trying to create an article which has been deleted. Please note that this is disruptive as it wasted a lot of community time. If I am not wrong, the Nexiva article was subject to a lot of promo pressure and I see User:DGG, User:Kudpung, User:Jbhunley, User:Brianhe, User:K.e.coffman, User:Duffbeerforme and User:Voceditenore have previously been involved in it. I guess they can have a look at it as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I believe it is already declared paid editing via his userpage[1]. Brianhe (talk) 03:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Brianhe. (I somehow missed the user page). The instructions at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure#How_to_disclose were clearly not followed here then - the article talk page in question had no declaration. If I am not wrong, it also needs to be declared who is the "client" and the "employer". I don't see that here either. Is this a violation of our Terms of Use? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: per WP:PCD employer, client and affiliation should be listed in at least one of the designated places which includes the userpage. But it appears Renzoy says he went through an agency that acted as a proxy for the actual client, which makes proper declaration impossible. I think agencies like Upwork function this way. - Brianhe (talk) 04:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

If I am not wrong, the consensus at a previous incident was that COI editors will comply with the Terms of Use by disclosing employer, PR Firm, and clients. I don't see that happening here. Rather, I see suspicious accounts spring up and trying to comment here (See below). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

That's right User:Brianhe; Renzo followed WP:PCD to a point. It's not really fair that you're trying to WP:CANVASS a ton of editors to oppose him. If you can do that, I think people who supported the existence of Nextiva and Tomas Gorny on Wikipedia should be notified too: User:RHaworth, User:Kagundu, User:KGirlTrucker81, User:Sionk, User:Unscintillating, User:Bmbaker88, User:CNMall41 and User:Gargleafg. However, this really isn't the place to be discussing this. The article should be moved back to Nextiva in the mainspace and be discussed on the talk page. Panthersfan3472 (talk) 04:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

You created a brand new account to just comment here? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

And considering the fact that you (a seemingly new editor) came here all out of the blue, it's a bit hypocritical of you to talk about canvassing. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

It's fair to ask me, because I don't oppose articles on companies if they are good enough, and I always give a realistic opinion at AfC is I am asked, regardless of my personal preferences. Sections 1 and 2 of the current article are promotional. Normally non-promotional articles on small and medium size companies list only the CEO, so I find it indicative that for this one, the one other person listed is the marketing director. If the article is returned to mainspace, the odds are pretty good that it will be deleted again, and re-creation blocked.

The draft devotes itself to how the company does things good, It mentions trivial charities, thus proving there are no significant ones, it includes flattering quotes in the references from ordinary internet sources, it usea local business journals as references (they are just outlets for PR--in some cases here the same text is reprinted in multiple local sources which clearly shows where they got it, and it uses references that give mere mentions. As Lemongirl942points out, the TOU have not been fully followed. That alone is reason to reject an article, but it correlates with why we require the declaration--articles by paid editors are almost never satisfactory, and usually do have many of the problems I mentioned.

If the firm is really notable enough for an worth an article, a person without COI will write one. DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I share DGG thoughts on this entirely, Lemongirl942 is absolutely right, and as an admin I operate the same way. Nevertheless, DGG works more in this area than I do and , for me at least, is therefore a higher authority. What I will say in plain text however, in case it is not clear, is that a declaration of paid editing is still not a licence to write promotional articles. If we are honest, apart from large multinationals, to cite for example Microsoft, Apple, Nissan automobiles, and Texaco petrol, or American Airlines who don't need the additional presence on Wikipedia at all, every other attempt at a corporate mention on Wikipedia has marketing as its background. We see thousand of new articles a week of this kind, so we do know, and we keep statistics of it. Where I and DGG differ, is that I am probably quicker to block any user accounts that I consider to be misusing our ToU, and to block any IP that I think they might be using, not to mention that certain Wikipedia functionaries, of which DGG is one, have the authority to use some special technical tools that locate users and IP users and can of prove conclusively that IP users and different named account are coming from the same building and locality if not from the same computer. We are extremely quick to block accounts that are using proxies in order to cloak their identity and location. to advertise themselves and their clients in promotional pages masquerading as bona fidae articles about notable companies, schools, and other organisations, including even charitable non-profits. We do understand however, that the WMF, the organisation that owns the servers and the Wiki software dos not do a very good job of telling new users on registation exactly what they are allowed to write and what is not acceptable. The bottom line ntwithstanding, is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a B2B directory and is is built and run by unpaid volunteers who are not happy about people and organisations making a profit from volunteers' work.110.77.218.90 (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)(user:Kudpung, not logged in because I'm using a public connection)

right--I try to deal with the articles primarily. But I will block promotional-only accounts that repeatedly try to add advertising. And many promotional editors are sockpuppets, but other people are more skilled at dealing with that. Personally I support blocking any undeclared paid editor on the basis of persistent violation of the Terms of Use, but this is not yet policy. DGG ( talk ) 16:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you User:Lemongirl942 for your input. With the comments being stated here, I may try (unless any other editors here would like to undertake the task) of submitting the article to AfC at a later date (when I get time). I am confident that with all the sources there (as well as its notability), it would pass that venue at this point (while before it may have not). AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 03:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

As DGG said above, you are not complying with our TOU. If you don't comply, that is good enough grounds to reject an article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

I complied with the TOU by disclosing on my user page. However, if you'd like me to do so on the talk page, I'd be happy to oblige. Enjoy your day. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 04:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

No you haven't. You haven't declared the employer, client and affiliation. That needs to be declared. It's not optional. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nextiva has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nextiva. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nextiva

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nextiva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nextiva (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nextiva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 16:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

With all due respect User:SwisterTwister, you are incorrect, and I mean that in a way that genuinely assumes good faith. You have demonstrated a clear conflict of interest since you were the exact same individual to nominate Nextiva for deletion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (3rd nomination). I have completely rewritten and added multiple new sources to this new draft (from notable publications like Forbes, Entrepreneur, HuffPost, etc.). Therefore your assertion that "it's still unchanged" is blatantly false. The whole reason that I resubmitted the article via AfC is because I was just recommended by Lemongirl942 to do so, here. I'm going to request you to please revert yourself and have an non-involved administrator review the AfC (since you clearly have a stake in this issue as demonstrated by the previous AfD). After the draft has passed through AfC and if you wish to nominate it for deletion at that time, you're more than welcome to do that. User:RHaworth, could you please investigate this matter? Thanks, AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 17:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

The paid editing declaration has not been done properly here. The employer and client both need to be declared - and that has not been done here (I only see the employer, not the client). This is a blatant violation of our terms of service and I don't think think draft should be approved before this is clarified. This has also been deleted multiple times and at this moment it is gaming the system to recreate it again and again. The sources are also not good enough. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

Thank you for your academic integrity, which helps keep Wikipedia a top-notch resource for the global community to use.Jobas (talk) 01:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC) |} Proposed deletion of Chetu The article Chetu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Pure advertisement, sourced to press releases, directories, and the company site. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 16:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Hassan Bawab for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hassan Bawab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Bawab until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Question Your !votes at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wise Way (diff) and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Sehgal (3nd nomination) (diff) are strongly out of step with independent editors !voting at each discussion. Would you please say whether or not Sehgal is a client of your paid editing work? Also, you should be aware that people establish reputations in Wikipedia, and I encourage you (especially you) to be very mindful to work toward very high standards in content and sourcing. These articles are both promotional messes and have been subject to long term promotional pressure, and it is not useful (to you, especially) to argue to keep articles that are like this. Jytdog (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Talk:Ehsan Sehgal Hi Renzoy16, We seem to have different ideas about what sources would be appropriate for use in this article. I note in your recent revision you included many sources previously found to be unreliable, including some blog material and some articles that appeared not to be relevant to the subject or support the claims made of them. If there are specific sources that you believe have been erroneously removed, perhaps we could discuss them on a case-by-case basis on the talk page first? Best. Landscape repton (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:UberOffices logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:UberOffices logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:WNO official logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:WNO official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Nextiva has been accepted Nextiva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! 1990'sguy (talk) 12:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Magic Logix for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic Logix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Logix (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Official Flag of Bukidnon.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Official Flag of Bukidnon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Pinoy Big Brother 737 logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Pinoy Big Brother 737 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Pinoy Big Brother 5 logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Pinoy Big Brother 5 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter message Hello, Renzoy16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 7 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legal education in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Malcolm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 16 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robinsons Malls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Onswipe The article Onswipe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Promotional article on non notable company, based mainly on press releases While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 14:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Andrés Barreto The article Andrés Barreto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: promotional article for minor buisnessperson While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Onswipe Logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Onswipe Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 12 An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KZ Tandingan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Zeus Mortgage logo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Zeus Mortgage logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Online Trading Academy Logo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Online Trading Academy Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC) Nomination of Yashi for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Nomination of Vorsight for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vorsight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vorsight until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter message Hello, Renzoy16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Pinoy Big Brother Lucky 7.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Pinoy Big Brother Lucky 7.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Pinoy Big Brother - special season Template:Pinoy Big Brother - special season has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 04:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC) January 2019 Some of the material you included in Legal Education Board has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Alison (company) - conflict of interest? promotional editing Hello Renzoy16, I hope you don't mind me asking frankly but are you being paid for editing this company article? If so, please disclose this conflict of interest - I noticed, that you have already listed several previous connections on your user page (thank you for doing so). Unfortunately large parts of your recent edits are simply not encyclopedic. For example, parroting the founder's opinion and other PR statements directly from the company in multiple instances does add nothing for a credible uninvolved presentation of the topic. Also, large parts of the "Reception" and "Social Impact" stuff are either trivial, non-neutrally phrased or misrepresent the source out of context. I'm sorry if that sounds harsh, but it is nevertheless meant as constructive criticism about some mayor problems with your recent edit. This is more of a general but hopefully helpful comment, but if you are writing for PR publications professionally you'll need to try to find a completely different neutral and uninvolved encyclopedic tone for your Wikipedia editing. Most of the techniques and phrases common in business-related writing (I have worked there myself for quite a time) are not suitable for Wikipedia. GermanJoe (talk) 13:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Hi @GermanJoe: I have disclosed it in the article. And I am about to disclose it in my page when the edit was reversed. No no. I am not writing for any PR publications. I am on my own. I hope there is a middle ground here. I'll re-edit it to comply more with Wikipedia's standards. Perhaps, I'll place it first it in my user space and ping you for any possible review? Is that amenable to you?--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 13:45, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Hello Renzoy16, thank you for being straightforward about it. To clarify one possible basic misunderstanding: as an editor with a conflict of interest you should not edit the article yourself, but suggest changes (especially substantial content changes) on the article's talkpage for an uninvolved review. An uninvolved editor will then review it and implement it on your behalf, if it is deemed OK. About your edit: one fundamental principle is that content should be written about the topic, not from the topic. Thus almost all details about what the company or organization thinks about itself, what it plans to do, what their motivations are, how it tries to improve the world etc. etc. (summarized as "PR fluff") presented from the topic's own point of view do not belong in an article. Such information is not uninvolved encyclopedic content and is largely irrelevant, whether it comes from self-published sources or from secondary sources that merely repeat PR statements as interview quotes. Lastly: I will keep your infobox changes on good faith, but will revert the lead changes with PR speak. Please prepare further changes off-mainspace and suggest them as edit request on the article's talkpage when ready. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2019 (UTC) One more quick tip: if you suggest changes, I recommend to limit suggestions to 1 paragraph or 1 section per suggestion. It is easier for reviewers to check smaller batches, and if it is rejected it is usually easier to fix such mentioned issues in smaller increments and re-suggest them accordingly later. GermanJoe (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Sami W. Mnaymneh Hello, Renzoy16. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sami W. Mnaymneh". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Non-free content use Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically User:Renzoy16/sandbox2, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Centrio official logo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Centrio official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 31 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Supreme Court of the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC) WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – June 2019 Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Online Trading Academy Hello, Renzoy16. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Online Trading Academy". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC) WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2019 Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:PhilRice logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:PhilRice logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC) Note before you move another article again The term "Philippine" is ACCEPTABLE and the preferred disambiguation for Philippine related articles in Wikipedia. Try discussing this matter, with other editors before you move another Philippine television article that has the word "Philippine" in the article title, instead of moving dozens of article without proper discussion and consensus which you already did. TheHotwiki (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Nomination of NewtonX, Inc. for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NewtonX, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewtonX, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC) Nomination of Helpling for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helpling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helpling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC) Nomination of NewtonX, Inc. for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NewtonX, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewtonX, Inc. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 00:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC) NewtonX, Inc. Hello, Renzoy16. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you: avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors; propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template); disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI); avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam); do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. scope_creepTalk 21:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC) Nomination of Yew Kam Keong for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yew Kam Keong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yew Kam Keong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 12:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Nomination of Johnny Ferreira for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Ferreira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Ferreira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 12:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC) 2019 US Banknote Contest US Banknote Contest November-December 2019 There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) ArbCom 2019 election voter message Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Jobs-in-Dubai,com,-Inc.-logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Jobs-in-Dubai,com,-Inc.-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Yashi Hello Renzoy16, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yashi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks! Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Kingsif (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Yashi If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Yashi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC) Proposed deletion of File:Williform in Atlanta.jpg The file File:Williform in Atlanta.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: unused, low-res, no obvious use While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page. Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Positronic Industries logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Positronic Industries logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC) WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – January 2020 MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Proposed deletion of File:R. Williform photo.jpg The file File:R. Williform photo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: orphaned image, subject does not have a WP page, no encyclopedic use While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page. Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jordan 1972 (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC) COVID-19 case tracker @Renzoy16: Have you seen the latest version of the COVID-19 case tracker? They seem to be reporting cases by residence now. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 15:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC) @HueMan1: Yep. I have noticed that it got updated. But 50+% plus are still under validation. The website is kinda hard to navigate especially with the pie chart. I am having a hard time looking at those places with few cases. The hospital admission data too is outdated; the Davao hospital (SMPC) in the website says 1; but currently it's now less than 30. Shall I continue with this or focus on the cases "by locality" and "by hospital admission?" Is this website https://covid19ph.com/ reliable? I am also getting some data from there.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC) I think we should ask Hariboneagle927 about this. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 16:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC) I think so? They're constantly updating their site once new data comes out from reliable sources. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 16:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC) @HueMan1:@Hariboneagle927: I have crossed check the data of recoveries and deaths from the unofficial tracker website and from the DOH, they don't match (primarily of the residence data). I think we should be cautious in using the unofficial tracker. The official tracker is also buggy. Like for example, when I click Patient 20, it will give me the data of another patient, not Patient 20. That's what I have encountered earlier this afternoon.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Where should we include the number of deaths, by residence or by hospitalisation? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 17:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Hmmm. I have updated it and added it to both.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 18:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC) I checked the data, and confirm that the red dots on the map is now being recorded according to place of residence. I would have preferred to record deaths according to the place of admission. Also what do you you think of updating the map (or creating a separate map) to portray the provinces with confirmed cases (both according to hospital admission and place of residence) with the COVID tracker and announcement of individual LGUs as sources. I don't remember if this was the case for the similar map for the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the Philippines article which has a disclaimer of "as confirmed or suspected by different agencies", so there's a map that would give a rough image of the spread of the virus in the country since a map depicting cases solely relying on recorded cases per residence or hospital of admission does not accurately depict the situation.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC) I have a suggestion @Hariboneagle927, Renzoy16, Atikono1, and PatTag2659:, let's count cases by their hospitalisations but with the first facility they were admitted to (or were confirmed to be positive) because if we count them by their residences, cases from other countries won't fit in. In the case of maps, we can make them separate like I've mentioned earlier. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC) @Hariboneagle927, HueMan1, and Atikono1: The summary table for the cases I am condensing will surely help in determining which hospital or which locality has the certain numbers. My pace is kinda slow since I am still verifying each of the cases. I am currently cross matching the official and unofficial trackers' data; while filling empty information from the DOH bulletins and also from the trackers. If we can divide the table now, I think we should finish this in a few days. Once we get the complete data, or the most number of data we can count them all via Excel or Google Spreadsheet. More cases will surely be added today since they update the tally every 4pm, so I really need some help with the job. I'll try to update my other tables (the two others in my sandbox) from time to time.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 07:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC) I also did some research to verify and add more information with the other cases (those from PH200 and above) as more information are available via their local press and LGU press releases.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 07:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC) There seems to be a one-day (or more) lag after the confirmation of cases to be announced. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 08:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC) @Renzoy16: I am sorry again about yesterday. What are your plans with your draft? Are you planning to make a separate article out from it? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 18:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC) @HueMan1: No worries. Yes, I am planning to make a separate article for it. Since its also getting longer. The official tracker is kinda updated in some sense; so we can still update the list of cases. I have divided the cases by dates. If possible, anyone can edit any of the subsections; this will also lighten my work load. lol. I am occupied in attending my studies plus this, so any help will be greatly appreciated. I am gonna sleep now. I hope any of you guys can help me with this. Hehe --AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 18:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC) @Renzoy16: Cool, I'll be working on new cases, deaths, and recoveries. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 18:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Binibining Pilipinas official logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Binibining Pilipinas official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Happy Birthday! ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Lyndsay Petruny for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyndsay Petruny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyndsay Petruny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Nomination of RainStor for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RainStor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RainStor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:SILVIA logo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:SILVIA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Nofel Izz for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nofel Izz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nofel Izz (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Zeus Lending for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zeus Lending is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeus Lending until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Graymatics for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graymatics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graymatics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC) Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Wiki Professionals associates. Thank you. Bri.public (talk) 23:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:SILVIA logo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:SILVIA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC) WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2020 User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Happy Birthday! Happy Birthday from the Birthday Committee Wishing Renzoy16 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!--CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC) How do you solve a problem like 136.158.10.196? Comment I don't know about this user 136.158.10.196 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), but the guy's been messing up several PBB pages. Can you check them out and revert them accordingly? Can this user be reported to WP:AIV as well? Thanks. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 17:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC) I have made a last warning. Please report him if he continues to make any vandilism. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 23:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)