Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pancakes! (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pancakes!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines Wasabi,the,one (Talk Contributions) 23:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable youtube video. Meatsgains (talk) 23:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per 1st AfD. There are lots of weird stuff stubs on Wikipedia. Bearian (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- You know that's a satire essay, right? It's sarcastically arguing in favor of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to show how ridiculous that premise is. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's a trivial pop-culture event covered only by tabloids. The previous AFD was an embarrassing example of editors judging contributors instead of contributions. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It got a few fluff pieces about it when it was a current news item, but has not demonstrated any lasting notability. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Internet phenomena can be notable, but this one doesn't seem to be. There doesn't seem to be anything which shows lasting coverage after the video was released. It's also not clear what impact this video had. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.