User talk:Fm2145

January 2022

Hello, I'm Neveselbert. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Molly-Mae Hague have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:54, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ifan Knott moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ifan Knott, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 12:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Hicks (runner) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charles Hicks (runner), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 13:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On Athletics Club moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, On Athletics Club, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 16:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh rabbit

In this edit, you changed "British dish" to "Welsh dish" and marked the edit as minor. The article clearly states that there is no good evidence that this is a dish that comes from Welsh cuisine. The edit is obviously controversial and it is dishonest to mark it as "minor". --Macrakis (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's been popular in Cymru since at least the 1500s under the name of ‘caws pobi’. Key staple of the Welsh Valleys in the 1500s. It is not dishonest and it is clearly anti-welsh to state anything other then that it is a Welsh dish.

Your submission at Articles for creation: On Athletics Club (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Outside reference is great, but more references that provide extensive coverage via independent sources are necessary to meet the inclusion criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:On Athletics Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:On Athletics Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fm2145! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Forest Green Rovers F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Cook. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Virgil van Dijk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]