Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics
of the Wikipedia reference desk.
Main page: Help searching Wikipedia
How can I get my question answered?
- Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
- Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
- Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
- Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
- Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
- Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.
How do I answer a question?
Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines
- The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
March 16
Series for pi
Machin-like_formula says:
—
The following equations were derived in Angle addition formula:
Algebraic manipulation of these equations yields the following:
(3) |
—
Could someone explain what the manipulation is. -- SGBailey (talk) 13:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Working backwards, the sequence of steps is as follows: The arctan equation is a case of the Arctangent addition formula, which, as explained there, can be derived from the formula for . And that can be derived from the starting formulas via . Is that sufficient? --Wrongfilter (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wow, that is a confusing presentation. The variables in the formula do not correspond to the synonymous variables in the angle addition formulas for & . And why not directly appeal to the arctangent addition formula? Then this is immediate, apart from some elementary algebraic simplification of a compound fraction. --Lambiam 15:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- I have streamlined the presentation (as well as the formatting) in that section. --JBL (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks - now I understand where 5 and 239 mathemagically came from. -- SGBailey (talk) 09:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
March 19
Dissemination problem
Consider people, each of whom knows a particular fact. How many two-person meetings are required for everybody to know everything, where at each meeting everything known to date is shared? I can't get below , achieved in this way, for example: person meets everyone else up to person (taking meetings), then re-meets everyone from to (taking meetings). Is it possible to do the job in fewer, or indeed to prove that is the lowest number? →2A00:23C6:AA07:4C00:4C7E:441:A97:15A2 (talk) 13:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- It is certainly possible to do better in general: with , for example, the meetings AB, CD, AC, BD work. But in fact you only get that one bit of improvement: see https://oeis.org/A058992 . -- JBL (talk) 15:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
March 21
Change of variables formula
In the article Integration by substitution the following change of variables formula is mentioned:
- Let φ : [a, b] → I be a differentiable function with a continuous derivative, where I ⊆ R is an interval. Suppose that f : I → R is a continuous function. Then
My question is how to apply this is the measure theory sense without being injective ( is real valued and real Borel measurable and additional hypothesis may be imposed on it too). Specifically, I want to apply this formula to the case of finding the PDF of a function of a real valued random variable.-- Abdul Muhsy talk 04:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- OK I see that now.- Abdul Muhsy talk 08:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)