Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiSoftware (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SiSoftware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not realising WP:GNG policy of Wikipedia. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. A Google News search finds over 8,000 matches on articles containing the term "SiSoftware". Sean Brunnock (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Sifting through routine announcements, tech blogs, etc., the available sourcing doesn't meet the WP:NORG standard. It might be possible to craft an article about their product, but not about the company; given the current state of the page one might as well blow it up and start from scratch. XOR'easter (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I have to agree with the above, the article needs to be about the Sandra package - there's sufficient NCORP references for that. But there's not sufficient from what I can find to meet NCORP's notability criteria if the subject is the company. This should be TNT'ed. HighKing++ 20:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)