User talk:Josepdavidana
Welcome!
|
Please stop adding large amounts of copyright material, whether translated or original. If you have new content to add to the article please do so in standard Wikipedia style, making complete sentences of well-sourced information. PamD 18:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- In your latest series of 3 edits you removed content which had sources, and all the categories etc from the end of the article. Please stop damaging the encyclopedia. Please use edit summaries to explain what you are trying to achieve in your edits. I have reverted your 3 edits. PamD 12:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Prous Science, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. PamD 12:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please use edit summaries to explain what you are doing, especially when removing content, and take care not to damage the encyclopedia by removing categories, stub templates and other infrastructure of the article. PamD 14:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PamD 15:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Prous Science shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Muffled Pocketed 15:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)