Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Márquez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:56, 27 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing early as there is not a snowball's chance in hell of this being deleted. An WP:RM discussion to move the dab page and then the Enrique Marquez (US citizen) page looks to be the way forward if desired. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique Márquez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This DAB currently covers 4 people, only two of which uses the page name. It is holding up a page move for Enrique Marquez (US citizen) who is way more famous then Enrique Macaya Márquez. CSD declined by an Admin with the reason it is a DAB page (I don't understand that reason). Legacypac (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you reverted my effort to turn this into a redirect [1] I guess we do need an AfD after all. Delete the DAB, turn into a redirect to the guy charged with terrorism. Legacypac (talk) 03:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We can't just delete the dab page, it is being used. We could move it to Enrique Márquez (disambiguation), but since people disagree, you need to discuss the move at the talk page and get a consensus. Or (less optimally, IMHO, but an option) we could make Enrique Marquez (with no á) the page for the guy in California, with a hatnote to the dab page (with the á). Also needing discussion. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you need to learn about Spanish naming customs; "Márquez" is not the middle name of Enrique Márquez Jaramillo. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Having lived in Mexico City for a while, I am well aware of Spanish naming customs. In theory people can go by their given and first family name only, but Wikipedia is using their whole name. At RfD we just went through a bunch of these and deleted all that used that form.
I prefer to see the California guy at Enrique Marquez with not accent per say CNN [2] especially since he lives in the US where the accents are usually dropped. Legacypac (talk) 03:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We're using their whole name mainly because it offers the most natural and culturally sensitive way to disambiguate two Spanish-named people with the same WP:COMMONNAME. It doesn't weaken either of their claims to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the common form at all, any more than it would if they'd been dabbed as "Enrique Márquez (poet)" and "Enrique Márquez (footballer)". Bearcat (talk) 04:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Two of the four people on this list have stronger claims to PRIMARYTOPIC for this name than the US citizen cum alleged terrorist does, because they've both been far more famous and notable for far longer. So keeping the dab page at the plain title is the correct solution here; for all his current newsiness, the new guy has not trumpcarded the others for the plain title as of yet. Bearcat (talk) 04:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A guy who has been in the news for five minutes and whose own article is up for AfD does not warrant being the primary topic. WWGB (talk) 05:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 05:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There does not appear to be a dispute over the concept of a snow keep on deletion, and an assessment of debate also leans toward a snow keep of the current dab as primary topic. But it remains (potentially) possible that a rename might win support in further discussion. So as the path of least bureaucratic resistance I've reopened the AfD at Legacypac's request, on the basis that they are seeking an article rename and not deletion. Apologies to anyone inconvenienced by the to and fro.-- Euryalus (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since there is already a rename discussion happening at Talk:Enrique Marquez (US citizen) for that article, keeping this open to review a possible rename of the dab page (the only reason for which is so the article could be moved here) unnecessarily complicates matters. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.