Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light-Silver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Light-Silver

Non-existant, unencyclopedic. Author imagines new colors and creates articles on them, as with Blue-yellow. Delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo "imagines" no? --Jingofetts 16:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC) they are colors KEEP. expand i needed. and image.[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not inifinite and in theory there are an infite number of colors. --Pboyd04 16:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- so your saying Light Silver is not a color you got to be ... light and silver. comment.
Delete color cruft...there are 16.7 million 24-bit colors in the naked city, we don't need to know their stories. Endomion 17:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom.--Esprit15d 17:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above, so many colours, they don't all need a page to themselves. -- (aeropagitica) 18:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Ajwebb 18:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PJM 18:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Revolución (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sceptr e ^(Talk) 21:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Delete. Is there a way to stop contributors from wasting everyone's time with inane articles like this one? Logophile 01:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, and recommend to bundle all the non-notable-color-AFDs together.. —Quarl ^(talk) 2005-12-31 03:09Z
Delete. NeoJustin 17:58, December 31, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, Spank, Ban. *gives Logophile a relaxing neck rub* rodii 19:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with a possible BJAODN for the whole article series. Stifle 00:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Done for this one! --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.